|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
|
from an old copy of the audio critic comes this excerpt (regarding getting more bass from smaller boxes, this time with the explanation of how and why stuffing works)
arrgh, can't copy and paste from the pdf....http://www.theaudiocritic.com/back_i...ritic_17_r.pdf he talks about the stuffing absorbing heat upon compression and releasing it later, and again upon rarefraction the opposite, the net result being that the woofer moves more freely. (pdf page twenty in the section of acoustic suspension boxes of s/one can copy and paste for me) That is for me a good description, well one I can understand, of why stuffing a box makes it seem larger to the woofer. It makes me think of a regenerator in a stirling motor, and led me to wonder what the results may be if we used a metal, say steel wool of sufficient thinness instead of fibreglass. It will more readily heat and cool than fibreglass no?, therefore would we see a 'bigger box' for the woofer? Leaving aside any electrical contact and shortciruits (not hard to overcome) or any magnetic induction (surely not a real world problem or hard to overcome) but purely based on the ability to store heat and release it quickly, would not fine steel wool work better than equivalently sized fibreglass? |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Sounds like a recipe for disaster to me. Any strands of steel WILL be attracted to the pole pieces on the speakers and will cause the voice coil to rub. Don't even go there
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
|
not thinking of trying it, just curious about the aspects outlined, the better (presumably) ability to store and release heat, which seems to be the reason for stuffing.
for the sake of a 'mind experiment', lets say any practical problems can be overcome, which surely would not be hard to do. Not hard to keep any steel wool away from unwanted areas. let's say a manufacturer could easily overcome those problems, if they could would there be any 'market' advantages in terms of better performance? |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
|
There are non-magnetic metal wools out there - search for 'metal wool' on McMaster-Carr's website.
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| OB Wool vs 703 Fiberglass ? | GregOH1 | Multi-Way | 2 | 27th May 2007 05:07 PM |
| long haired wool | vitalstates | Full Range | 23 | 7th February 2007 04:09 PM |
| wool vs Dacron/BAF in TL | Henkjan | Full Range | 6 | 12th September 2006 05:15 AM |
| FS: Long fiber wool | mikebarney | Swap Meet | 1 | 8th February 2006 02:03 AM |
| Glass wool. Is it dangerous? | sachi | Multi-Way | 15 | 20th March 2005 01:31 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.09740 seconds (71.36% PHP - 28.64% MySQL) with 10 queries |