|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#11 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Next door
|
I find Pluto visually a marvel. Auditively maybe. At one condition : just like same author's Orions, far away from any wall. And I think it is exactly the same for any speaker with small front baffle.
Such positioning is not possible for many people who have space constraints with their room. For this case, I have been investigating the radically opposite way, the two pi emission, just like the Sonus Faber Stradivari Homage http://www.sonusfaber.com/eng/home.html My current speakers are 2 ft wide with 1/2 ft rounded corners, slightly angled and about 2 1/2 away from the rear wall. I think I won't soon come back to smaller baffles in my current room. |
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
|
Quote:
a) Is true but it is the worst shape for baffle step ripple and has an abrupt edge. b) Is not possible, the smallest baffle size is the size of the driver. The design has excellent inherent rigidity but not the smoothest diffraction response, that is a truncated ovoid or sphere. sreten.
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Canton, MA
|
Quote:
Measurements of lesser quality drivers of this size that I've made show diffraction even on modest boxes to be minimal for drivers that size other than baffle step. I would expect no diffraction artifacts other than step for that B&W unit mounted as it is. The tweeter will also show little impact. It's 4-pi very early due to the configuration. The diffracted signal that is quickly in the 4-pi range will be very highly dispersed, so the impact on any single specific axis will be minimal as well. B&W takes just about everything into consideration in their designs. Significant diffraction would be dealt with in their better systems. I'd say that they've handled diffraction quite well in this case, aesthetics notwithstanding. Dave |
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Baffle width and cabinet depth | Lewis Moon | Multi-Way | 1 | 5th October 2008 06:12 PM |
| open baffle width? | saramac | Multi-Way | 3 | 3rd October 2007 03:56 AM |
| changing baffle width on zaph's design | chainenoble | Multi-Way | 4 | 11th January 2007 06:57 PM |
| Will routing edges of front baffle affect sound? | Ken C | Multi-Way | 12 | 3rd December 2004 08:57 AM |
| Baffle width vs dispersion | Vg | Multi-Way | 5 | 13th October 2003 06:34 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |