|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
|
Hi there,
What resources are available (free on the web would be ideal!) for calculating and approximating crossover designs? The rough requirements would be a fairly steep (12 dB / oct) 2 way design, that can correct for phase distortions to some extent. In addition to the crossover, how does one go about calculating a baffle-step compensation network? Thank you, Jim |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
|
Check out John Kreskovsky's site. Lots of transient perfect papers.
Here is a caveat though. I have designed a transient perfect 3 way speaker using John's work as it's basis. Designing a transient perfect speaker is challenging. It usually requires fairly extensive XO design skills. You will also need the tools and knowledge to be able to take accurate measurements of your drivers in your cabinets for frequency response/phase and impedance. Not to mention drivers which lend themselves to this type of design. Your question about how to calculate a baffle step in a XO imples that maybe you are new to speaker design. If so a transient perfect or even semi transient perfect speaker will be a tall order. Regards, Dennis |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Western Sydney
|
Rod's page has a couple of relevant articles under 'crossovers':
http://sound.westhost.com/articles.htm
__________________
Impedance varies with frequency, use impedance plots of your drivers and make crossover calculations using the actual impedance of the driver at the crossover frequency |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
|
Thank you all for the references and suggestions.
It is true, I am rather new to serious design, and I have much to learn. Djarchow, a transient perfect design sounds interesting, but is likely beyond my means. Also, for my purposes, I can live with some phase shift and less than ideal transfer function. This is fun, I'm learning already! I thought 12 dB / octave was rather steep, but it seems this is only a 2nd order acoustic slope. My goal is a moderately accurate 2 way, for modest SPL and near-field, smallish room duty. Zaph has a nice looking design in his SR71 (Lockheed Martin might have something to say about that name!). Hmm, that would fit the bill nicely. However trying something on my own might make for an interesting failure at the very least. Though new to advanced loudspeaker concepts, I have a background in electronics, namely analog circuit analysis. I have enough test equipment and knowledge for crude frequency response measurements, and impedance measurements, but not distortion. I have been eye-balling the Seas P18RNXP. Hmm, it is pretty! Zaph's impression of this driver seems favorable - and he makes mention of distortion characteristics in a mostly qualitative way. Its poly cone might not be as articulate as some, but it looks to be free of any serious breakup, which would simplify my XO (and thus reduce my opportunities for screw-ups!). 30 degrees off-axis still looks nice beyond 2K, suggesting a reasonable XO point, but Zaph mentions that HD levels increase beyond 800 Hz. Anyway, this is mostly thinking out loud. It's all very interesting - thanks again for the links and such. I'm itching to start playing with some XO design! Jim |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Silicon Valley
|
Since your background is electronics, it would seem natural to go active crossover? Presumably you've seen Linkwitz' website, linkwitzlab.com?
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Polynomialand
|
Quote:
(ii) 12dB/oct would be a worry if you were concerned about intermodulation distortion. In your context (smallish room duty) you are looking at using barely a couple of watts; at those power levels, intermodulation distortion is not a concern and 12dB/oct is ample. (iii) If you can take frequency response and impedance measurements you are blessed! Make sure you design your crossover using the *in-enclosure* frequency response and impedance measurements for your drivers. -Ram |
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Phase Linear 400, SERIOUS AC! | Planerguy | Solid State | 41 | 29th March 2009 02:41 AM |
| Phase Linear Model 200 help needed | Original Burnedfingers | Solid State | 14 | 11th November 2006 02:54 PM |
| Active crossover with linear phase response | ackcheng | Solid State | 1 | 20th July 2004 05:54 AM |
| Crossover design mojo...phase alignment with a hint of zobel? | camusmuse | Multi-Way | 0 | 6th March 2004 12:12 AM |
| crossover/box design help needed | trespasser_guy | Multi-Way | 2 | 21st April 2003 10:30 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |