|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
|
Which of these speakers would you use?
Currently on my system; Celestion Ditton 15XR with uprated tweeters. Available as alternatives: Gale Gold Monitors Wharfedale Linton 3XP I am going to put two pairs into storage and use just one pair, so which should go into storage and which should stay? More to the point, are any of these any good or should I be scraping my pennies together to get something different altogether? Thanks for your advice guys, my apologies for still asking "green" questions... |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Sydney
|
keep the ones you like to listen to most, it's your ears you have to satisfy, not ours
__________________
‘today… there lives alongside the twentieth century the tenth or thirteenth. A hundred million people use electricity and still believe in the magic power of signs and exorcisms” Trotsky |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
|
Thats the Celestions then. I just haven't been into this long enough to trust my ears and don't want to miss a trick!
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
|
Just tried the Gales... never really liked them, no bottom end and a bit tinny at the top. Guess they can stay connected to my PC (via an old Cambridge Audio amp)
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
|
Well, i just tried the Wharfedale speakers, they lacked some of the warmth and detail of the celestions. The only place they were an improvement was in lower midrange, but not enough to write home about. The Celestion Dittons stay!
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Sydney
|
See, you can trust your ears...
__________________
‘today… there lives alongside the twentieth century the tenth or thirteenth. A hundred million people use electricity and still believe in the magic power of signs and exorcisms” Trotsky |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
|
I'm beginning to understand some of the terminology they use; its always appeared a little esoteric before.
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
|
I can understand different speakers having different tones and such, that makes sense. The thing I find a little hard to believe is different power leads making a difference, things like that. I don't understand how a silver mains cable is better than a normal one, especially when you have smoothing caps after the rectifier to give you a nice smooth DC output, with a reserve of current if high current draw spikes are encountered. Surely smoothed DC is smoothed DC, and the cable used on the AC, pre rectified input is fairly academic, as long its of reasonable quality. The same argument could be used for speaker spikes, I don't yet understand those. In aircraft we use antivibration mounts to isolate things, I have never seen a spike used.
Either its an audiophile BS filled minefield or there is some truth in it I don't fully understand yet. High end audio seems to be filled with stuff like this. My field is aircraft flight test instrumentation: I design and build military flight test recording and instrumentation systems with minimal noise and the lowest weight possible to operate in -50 degrees centigrade up to +80 degrees centigrade, and we don't put as much effort or as posh materials into our systems as some audiophiles!
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.10245 seconds (77.40% PHP - 22.60% MySQL) with 9 queries |