|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
|
I recently built my first set of speakers (a set of Magna Cum Laudes), and they work great.
This set of speakers is going to college with me, but my dad liked them so much that he would like me to build a second set for the house. As an amplifier, we have an Onkyo TX-SR805, which is capable of biamping the front speakers. So my questions are: Is biamping worth it from a sound quality perspective? (non-biamping already provides more than enough volume) What changes would need to be made to the crossover network (other than disconnecting the woofers from the mid/tweet)? Thanks! |
|
|
|
|
#2 | ||
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Sydney
|
__________________
‘today… there lives alongside the twentieth century the tenth or thirteenth. A hundred million people use electricity and still believe in the magic power of signs and exorcisms” Trotsky |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
|
I like bi-amping.
If the crossover has twin terminals to allow bi-wiring, it is suitable for bi-amping.
__________________
regards Andrew T. |
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
1. use passive exist crossover the both part for tweeter and woofer, loaded separated amplifier. it's easy 2. make active crossover yourself. it's prety difficult but it's looks like arts, engineering
__________________
Artmaster live in www.artmaydan.org.ua |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
|
What I was thinking, was that I could disconnect the part of the cross that fed the woofers, and make that into the second terminal. I was thinking that the woofer part of the cross would have to be included into the circuit to get the correct frequency roll offs (terminology?), but the link that Pete posted doesn't seem to have any passive cross components on the woofer side.
So, do I need to remove/bypass the woofer part of the cross, or do I need to keep that in the circuit. The crossover for the speakers: http://www.partsexpress.com/projects...sover%20Design |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
|
I should throw in that I can't use active crossovers in the traditional sense, as the receiver I am using has all of that built in (I think) and it is sort of off limits to tweaking as an idiot proofing measure. If I find any more info on it, I'll post it.
Thanks! |
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Atlanta, GA
|
Quote:
You will need to use a terminal block on the speaker that has 4 banana jack connections. Like this: http://www.partsexpress.com/pe/showd...number=260-304 The top 2 connections are Plus / Minus for the tweeters, and the bottom 2 connectors are (surprise) the Plus / Minus for the woofers. Wire up your woofers to the bottom connectors, and the mids and tweeter to the top connectors. For normal use, a little gold plated piece connects the top and bottom connectors, and you connect your amp to either the top or bottom, doesn't matter. For bi-amp use, remove the little gold plated piece and connect your Onkyo to the mids and tweets on the top connector. Hookup a separate amp to the pre-outs on the Onkyo and hook it up to the bottom connectors. You'll have to play around with levels a bit to make sure you are balanced top to bottom. HTH, -Don |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
|
After reading some more about crossovers, I have another question:
The speakers I'm using have second order filters, which (as I understand it) can cause some strange effects in the phase of the sound. How should this be handled in a biamping situation? |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
|
When you say strange things, do you mean the 180 degree phase reversal of a 2nd order Xover?
If so, it is a simple matter of reversing the polarity to the tweeter. Many active xovers has polarity reverse switchs for such a situation. |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| LM3886 in biamping? | ratza | Chip Amps | 6 | 3rd January 2008 10:09 AM |
| Zen-biamping | ijomojo | Pass Labs | 2 | 28th July 2005 08:01 AM |
| biamping questions | till | Multi-Way | 4 | 29th June 2004 11:57 AM |
| A Question for the Wizzard-Biamping The X Aleph | macka | Pass Labs | 1 | 20th June 2004 01:42 AM |
| Biamping without active x-over? | ngee | Multi-Way | 11 | 20th June 2002 04:52 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.11920 seconds (80.51% PHP - 19.49% MySQL) with 10 queries |