|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
I really would like to design my own set of speakers. I am looking at using the Vifa XT25TG30-04 Ring Radiator for the tweeter as I have heard good things about it and would like to try a ring radiator, and the Tang Band W6-1721 6-1/2" Underhung Midbass Driver for the woofer. I was wondering if these 2 drivers would mate up well with each other and what X-over frequency I should use, I was think 2kHz or so, but I would love suggestions from people who know more than me. Also, I would need a box design, would obviously like a compact bookshelf design. Any help will be greatly appreciated.
Here are the designs PE gave: http://rapidshare.com/files/13835029...esign.zip.html Sorry it's a RapidShare, but they used PDFs and I didn't know how else to do it. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Hmm, well the PE design of 3500hz 2nd order on both would work but certainly not optimal. Power response would be poor from 1600-1800hz up to the crossover area. Like you say, around 2000hz would be a better starting point. The PE designed box tuning though should work fine.
A XT25 works very well at 2000hz xover with 3rd order electrical. You can use a resonance trap or not, I've tried it both ways with a network like this and I didn't notice any improvement with the trap. I'd bet that the Tang Band would work well with a 1st order electrical and a Zobel ... tune both to get a steeper transfer function than 1st order. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
I should have mentioned that I am a complete beginner in crossover design and soeaker design. I know a lot about audio, but not design, lol. My "reference" speakers are B&W DM603-S3s, I love them. So, if you do suggest designs I will need help understanding them and also with the design. Thanks in advance.
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
If you're a n00b, I'd suggest building a throughly documented published design ... or a kit from a supplier. Once you get that under your belt start thinking about putting together an original design.
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Polynomialand
|
Quote:
1. As far as possible, design the crossover AFTER you have designed the enclosure. For best results, crossovers need to be designed around the impedance/SPL behavior of the drivers when mounted in their enclosure (either actual or simulated) 2. Sealed enclosures will exhibit much less degradation in performance if "misaligned". Vented enclosures are much less forgiving. So if you design your own with or without help, go for a sealed alignment. 3. Drivers best suited for a sealed enclosure are those whose Fs/Qes ratio (both these numbers appear in the specs) is less than about 75, preferably closer to 50. The woofer you chose has a ratio of 81. - Ram |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2005
|
My friend, I am afraid that you are asking the almost impossible
unless someone can use Zaphs measurements in a sim But do it yourself, play with it and you may be lucky, after some(long) time My advice would be 12db filters with series resistors on paralel components, and play a lot with the values...and also play a lot with tweeter padding resistor values...and place an RC on tweeter On TB woofer you may also need a notch above 3khz(not shown) |
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
Ok, if that is impossible is there another woofer that would go well with that tweeter in about the same price range? Lets cap the price for the woofer at $60. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2005
|
I didnt say there would anything wrong with woofer ... it seems quite ok, apart from Zaph measuring a very low 83db SPL
What I meant was, that its not so easy to make any XO, no matter what drivers you choose If you are after good sound and a good speaker then you should choose a proven design, whatever that may be Only do what you plan to do, if you want plenty of years of fun...and frustration
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Sydney
|
Getting started in Crossover Design
the basics (You've got to understand the rules before you can break them :-) http://sound.westhost.com/lr-passive.htm choosing xover point: http://www.speakerbuilder.net/web_f.../xpointmain.htm Baffle Step Compensation: http://sound.westhost.com/bafflestep.htm Getting it done: Jay has a page on designing xovers using manufacturers specs without measuring: http://www.geocities.com/woove99/Sp...DesigningXO.htm Calculators: http://ccs.exl.info/calc_cr.html#second http://www.sengpielaudio.com/calculator-Lpad.htm Measurement freeware: Synrta - http://libinst.com/SynRTA.htm ARTA http://www.fesb.hr/~mateljan/arta/download.htm ARTA Jig - http://zobsky.blogspot.com/2008/01/s...t-jig-for.html
__________________
‘today… there lives alongside the twentieth century the tenth or thirteenth. A hundred million people use electricity and still believe in the magic power of signs and exorcisms” Trotsky |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Design of Transmission line speakers | ArjenShenzhen | Multi-Way | 4 | 16th June 2009 07:33 PM |
| Speakers, Lifestyle, & Design | speaker | Multi-Way | 71 | 9th February 2008 02:09 AM |
| design extremely low SPL coroporate america 1-way speakers | phorensic | Full Range | 7 | 2nd September 2006 09:00 PM |
| Help me design these speakers please | pjpoes | Multi-Way | 0 | 10th November 2005 11:15 PM |
| Design Speakers | bvgoor | Multi-Way | 5 | 29th May 2004 09:07 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.14197 seconds (77.09% PHP - 22.91% MySQL) with 11 queries |