|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
|
Do they take frequency response measurements using infinite baffle, a standard baffle, a standard box, or something else? PE and MCM appear to have data from CLIO--does it require a particular setup?
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
|
There are "guidelines" moreso than standards when it comes to speaker measurement. Most of the measurements are made on a baffle, open on both sides. There are official IEC sizes for measurement baffles, but unless the datasheet specifically calls out what baffle was used, do not assume that it was a particular standard baffle.
IEC Baffle Sizes from Roman Bednarek's pages: ![]() There are some standard distances from which speakers are measured, the most common being 1m. Moving the microphone can result in different response curves, and I would suspect it is not uncommon for manufacturers to use the measurement distance which is most flattering to their product. Again, if the distance is not called out on the datasheet or given on the companies webpage, take it with some salt. Manufacturers measurements, and third-party measurements for that matter, are only one minor tool in the speaker selection process. Even if the measurements are accurate for the test baffle conditions, the response will change greatly when placed into a speaker enclosure. CLIO is a measurement package (software and hardware). There are many other measurement suites out there, ranging from free (speaker workshop) to very expensive. -David |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
|
David, thanks for the test baffle design diagram--that'll help me lay out the baffle simulation.
I may not have included enough context in my question: I'm launching into my first crossover design using the Frequency Response Consortium's set of FRD tools. I think I have a handle on it and am at the point of separating out measurement conditions from the manufacturer's response curves. Candidate drivers include (this is a low-budget project): Vifa BC25SC55-04 textile tweeter Vifa DQ25S16-04 Ti tweeter Dayton DA135-8 Al woofer MCM 55-3870 Al woofer Test conditions are not noted on the spec sheets, so I was wondering whether anyone knows how those manufacturers set up their tests. Thanks! |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Project VIDA, Dayton and Vifa | arjank | Multi-Way | 3 | 25th March 2009 02:12 PM |
| JBL comp drivers, Dayton Reference Sub drivers for auction NO RESERVE | pkpickard | Swap Meet | 1 | 21st January 2009 03:19 AM |
| dayton vifa parts express kit | i4gotmyid | Swap Meet | 5 | 16th May 2008 01:05 AM |
| Dayton,Audax, Vifa 3-way | rinx | Multi-Way | 6 | 20th November 2007 03:14 AM |
| Vifa/Dayton/Dayton... First speaker for me, finally! | alexcd | Multi-Way | 6 | 29th November 2006 10:54 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.07329 seconds (72.41% PHP - 27.59% MySQL) with 10 queries |