|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#511 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Switzerland
|
Earl, but maybe electroforming is a way to produce your waveguide in the intended cost/quantity ratio? *Dreaming of getting rid of filler*
Patrick, would love to see some pictures of your Summas. Best, Markus |
|
|
|
#512 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Switzerland
|
Quote:
Best, Markus |
|
|
|
|
#513 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Novi, Michigan
|
Quote:
Lidia and my paper was never submitted for publication, but I think that its on my web site. The data in AES is sparse and not directly applicable, but you can glean some important information from the works of Brian Moore in the audibility of group delay. Pay particular attention to the point he makes about how this form of signal distortion would be absolute level dependent. This is a key point, but one that he only mentions in passing and doesn't seem to put together the relavence. Because virtually all of the subjective work in loudspeakers is done at fairly low SPL levels, the diffraction, which is a group delayed signal, might never show up at those levels. But at some level it will and at even higher levels it will be the limiting factor in sound quality. John Vanommen has posted several times, and many others have noted, how loud the Summas play without fatigue, compression or coloration. I attribute this to two things; the thermal perfomance, which is virtually never considered in hih-fi speakers, and diffraction which is virtually never considered at all. The hard data is sparse, but all available data points to exactly what I am saying. |
|
|
|
|
#514 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Novi, Michigan
|
Quote:
I've built more of these devices than you could possibly imagine and I am perfectly comfortable with my approach. When others quote costs they are only quoting materials, not tooling, time, etc. OK, the material cost for one of my baffles is about $15. The rest is labor, tooling amoritization and IP. When are these costs going to be factored into these outrageous claims? |
|
|
|
|
#515 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Novi, Michigan
|
Quote:
Markus I'm not sure what you mean here, but as a blanket statement it is incorrect. If you were to decorrelate the two stereo signals the imaging would disappear. The correlation of the left and right signals is precisely what the ear uses to localize. |
|
|
|
|
#516 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Switzerland
|
Earl,
I'm not talking about summing localization but reflections (see papers from Ando 1977, Toole 2006, Walker 1994). Best, Markus |
|
|
|
#517 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Novi, Michigan
|
And I'm not talking about refections but diffraction.
Or are you refering to the decorrelation comment? If so, then yes a decorrelated reflection would be an advantage to imaging, just as elliminating the early reflections would be even better. But such things are not possible, reflections are coherent and ever present. Decorrelation only occurs after multiple reflections, many ms. after the initial arrival and the early reflections. |
|
|
|
#518 |
|
diyAudio Chief Moderator
|
Is it what we commonly call ''reverberation''?
|
|
|
|
#519 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Switzerland
|
Quote:
Is there a way to measure or calculate the point when a reflection becomes decorrelated enought to have a positive impact? |
|
|
|
|
#520 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: UK
|
Quote:
Businesses go under everyday and yes its horrible for those involved. However I think it goes without saying that if the product isn't up to standard then this will only become an inevitability and that company won't be missed. Harsh but true. Regardless of how generous folks are with their time, the minute they sell something, there's a certain level of quality to be reached - enough to satisfy the customer. You see I could setup a shop front with a humble OAP at the desk dealing with customers. Folks would never be rude to that guy, well reasonable folks wouldn't. My point? I could supply substandard product and should anyone shout down to the old man on the desk, others would rightly flock to save him. Does it make it right though? Depends at who and what your looking at. The moral of the story here? Geddes is an OAP ![]() BTW Wiggins failed not because of the DIY market but because some of his partners ran off with a load of money and he made a bad call switching production to overseas. He also, at times, provided shoddy aftersales service. Folks were and still are screaming out for his drivers so the demand is and was there. Behind every failed business there's usually either bad decisions involved or bad products.
__________________
The more you know who you are and what you want, the less things will ever be the same. |
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
| New To Site? | Need Help? |