|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
|
I've decided for my project that I want to build 4 MTM towers, plus an MMTMM center channel, using the Hi-Vi B3N and an as yet undecided tweeter.
Towers: Using the online ISD at http://www.linearteam.dk/default.aspx?pageid=newdriver with the specs for the B3N from http://www.partsexpress.com/pdf/297-428z.txt (vas: 0.62 l, Qts: 0.9, Fs: 114.5 Hz) I get a required vented volume of 0.6183 cu. ft. for 2 drivers. A tower made of .75" at 5" x 7.5" x48" gives an interior volume of 0.646 cu. ft. Am I correct in guessing that the extra volume (0.026 cu. ft.) could be successfully filled up by the drivers, crossover and bracing, or is that too much or too little? Center: I want to base this off of the Cynosure (http://www.partsexpress.com/projects...oject=Cynosure) but using the B3N (and same un-chosen tweeter) so it will match the towers. Using the same specs as above but for 6 drivers I get a required vented volume of 1.8555 cu. ft, while the original design plans using the Tang Band W3-926S state a required vented volume of 0.5 cu. ft. I realize these are different drivers with different specs, but that just doesn't seem right to me. A box with the original height and width (4" x 24") made of 1/2" would have to be 47.5" deep. Am I missing something? If someone with more experience would run over my numbers for the tower and center I'd be very appreciative. Also any tweeter suggestions would help too! Thanks a million!
__________________
Jeremy - http://alucinari.net |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
|
Slight correction: The width for the towers was supposed to read 5.5", not 5".
__________________
Jeremy - http://alucinari.net |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
|
Hi,
Venting any driver with Qts = 0.9 is pointless. Vas of 3" drivers is around a litre, and around 2L to 3L sealed and well stuffed each is what is required. 2L is minimum, > 3L fairly pointless. |
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
|
Quote:
Would venting them negatively affect the sound quality or is it just the extra required size that makes it pointless? I'm still thinking something is wrong with my numbers, as the required size for those boxes is still turning out huge.
__________________
Jeremy - http://alucinari.net |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
|
That's because these programs are fairly dumb. And once Qts gets above .707 the resulting "optimum" box gets unreasonable. You have to exercise some good judgement. Read the June 12 posting here: http://zaphaudio.com/blog.html
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
|
Quote:
So what kind of numbers would you say I should be considering when building sealed or vented enclosures with the B3N?
__________________
Jeremy - http://alucinari.net |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
jsalbre,
FYI: Using the given driver data and suggested dimensions in a ported box, i.e. aperiodic damped tower speaker. See pictures 1(3) to 3(3). b 1(3) |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
2(3)
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
3(3)
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
|
Wow, thanks bjorno!
I haven't the foggiest if those are good or bad results though, would you mind translating?
__________________
Jeremy - http://alucinari.net |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Idea for tall slim B3s design- MMTMM | joe carrow | Multi-Way | 59 | 27th November 2009 10:11 PM |
| Surround towers + center | jsalbre | Multi-Way | 3 | 21st July 2008 07:12 PM |
| Would this be MMTMM or WMTMW... | elambert | Multi-Way | 3 | 23rd July 2005 03:08 AM |
| progress pic MMTMM based on HIVI B3N | Tazz | Multi-Way | 1 | 18th July 2005 05:03 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.12571 seconds (79.06% PHP - 20.94% MySQL) with 11 queries |