|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Europe
|
The goal is to design a superlative 2-way monitor.
Which one will be the best front-disposition (drivers and port) - A, B, or C? (check picture). Why? Thanks! |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Destiny
|
Any reason you are not putting the port on the back of the enclosure??
Rob |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Europe
|
Rob,
Why should I put the port on the back of the enclosure? One reason to put in the front - less placement constraints (distance to the rear wall). |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Destiny
|
I like to keep the front baffle as difraction free as I can. There is always some port noise at high levels. I always drop mine on the rear to avoid both issues. If you are not going to stand mount them and need them on the front that works too but in that case I would go for A to keep the ports away from the area between both drivers.
Rob |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Lostwithiel, Cornwall
|
Interesting, Look at my thread regarding front and rear ports. I'm sure it would be suitable on small cabinets though, but it worked for me. Sharing the displacement. Especially at high level.
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Sydney
|
'A' would give a more rigid enclosure...
__________________
‘today… there lives alongside the twentieth century the tenth or thirteenth. A hundred million people use electricity and still believe in the magic power of signs and exorcisms” Trotsky |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Europe
|
Thanks for the answers. A few observations:
Ports near or distant from drivers Rob, you may be right, but don't you find strange a few top manufacturers decided to short the distances from ports to drivers, in some cases to Zero http://www.viennaacoustics.com/products/haydn/haydn.php http://www.linn.co.uk/music_systems_komri http://www.genelec.com/products/2-way-monitors/1032a/ Enclosure Rigidity Pete, that is correct but not an issue, as I will be using granite side panels and aluminium font and rear panel. Front vs. Rear Despite all the theory, in my setup, all the front ported speakers provided better results (several placements attempted) especially more focus and clarity. Also, I don't play at high levels. Port shape/number of ports Won't two ports or the rectangular port provide the best vent noise/speed balance? Drivers vertical alignment Aligned or not? Unaligned example: Proac Response 1SC. |
|
|
|
|
#8 | ||||
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
|
Hi,
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I've done experimentation with this.... two ports are better than one. Quote:
Cheers! |
||||
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| MTM Port placement between drivers? | tresch | Multi-Way | 4 | 2nd June 2009 12:25 AM |
| 1x10" bass guitar monitor with variable port tuning and notch filter? | alexclaber | Multi-Way | 7 | 1st April 2008 06:24 PM |
| 4 drivers-What change in BR-port? | Mingo | Multi-Way | 2 | 8th July 2007 08:30 PM |
| Placing the port(s) behind the drivers | cm961 | Multi-Way | 9 | 18th June 2003 04:54 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.10393 seconds (78.74% PHP - 21.26% MySQL) with 11 queries |