|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
|
Nearly all of the HT designs I've found are optimized for a distinct listening position. What if you don't HAVE a listening position? Every comfy spot in my living room gets used during movie night. My wife likes to re-arrange the room, and frequently sets up the TV catty-corner (where the heck do I put the surrounds?!). She decorates beautifully and I fully support all that, so I want to build a system which sounds decent from all over the room rather than excellent from one spot.
I'm looking for some help on design priorities. Here's what I've got so far: - Main speakers with little to no beaming, meaning relatively small woofers and/or low crossover points. - Wide-dispersion center channel--I listen up to 45 degrees off-axis. For WAF, a horizontal speaker is preferred. D'Appolito? I've read about the "quasi-spherical" distribution, but most MTM designs I see don't have the 3rd order Butterworth I thought that required. - Monopole surrounds, high on the wall, pointed at the ceiling (per Dickason's suggestions in the LDC) since I don't have a "sweet spot" away from which to aim the surrounds. Am close to the right track? What have others of you done in similar situations? |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
|
diesel, you might want to try GR research's a/v-1rs. it is supposed to have very good dispersion so may give a wide range of seating options. email danny and see what he says about using it as a main.
blue934 http://www.gr-research.com/index.asp...ROD&ProdID=113 |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
|
Home theater? Wide dispersion and sweet spot??
..Seems to me like constant directivity would be the best solution. |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Chamblee, Ga.
|
Duh!
__________________
Loud is Beautiful if it's Clean! As always though, the usual disclaimers apply to this post's contents. |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
|
Design the center as a 3 way WMTW as it results in much better horizontal off axis response than an MTM. You get the form factor and increase sensitivity of dual woofers along with the horizontal off axis benefits of an MT.
Regards, Dennis |
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Wilson Watt Puppy Clone Design - Design Review Please | soundengine355 | Multi-Way | 8 | 15th August 2008 02:07 PM |
| 4th order bandpass, wheel well design :) (design inside) | TWOJZ | Car Audio | 28 | 13th January 2008 02:56 PM |
| Match priorities to schematic & toobs | rick57 | Tubes / Valves | 43 | 21st May 2006 11:47 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.09517 seconds (73.45% PHP - 26.55% MySQL) with 10 queries |