|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Lostwithiel, Cornwall
|
Hi, I thought this might be of interest. I decided to convert my old eltax floorstanders to something a bit nicer. I replaced the drivers with good quality JMP's and fitted a Kef 3 way crossover. Much better, but because they are rear ported cabinets and are fairly close to the walls I decided I would change them to front ports.
The rear ports are at the top behind the tweeters? OK, I drilled a big hole in the bottom front and put in plastic port fittings from the JPM boxes. Out of interest I thought I would try the one I had modified before I blanked off the rear port. It sounded great. I tied a book to the rear port, and gues what? It wasn't as good. After several lash ups, I now have speakers with a rear port at the top and a front port at the bottom, with what seems to me as superior sounding boxes. No booming or resonance at any volume. I'm driving them with a Quad 33/303 set up with Meridian MCD and Nakamich MR-1 casette player. I wonder if anyone else has tried twin ports like this. I would be interested inany comments, for or against. Thanks for reading. Good listening. Barry |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
|
Hi Barry
I came across your post after searching the forum for threads on Eltax speakers. Interesting that I've (accidently) discovered how to improve the sound of my "Eltax" floorstanders by leaving the terminal plates hanging out of the boxes, thus ending up with two bass ports
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Lostwithiel, Cornwall
|
Hi Rob, that is most interesting as I thought no-one would ever reply to this stread. Interesting you mention the tweeters as part of my mod was to add a second tweeter. That made no improvement so I braced of the internal one with mdf inside the cabinet and bingo! more improvement. I'm now running them with a gainclone amp and linn sondek turntable and they zre greeeeeeeat. Barry
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
|
I think some internal bracing will be very benificial for my speakers as they are made from 12mm chipboard by the look of it, what's the worst that can happen?
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Herefordshire
|
There is an inexplicable effect with ported enclosures I've observed.
A friend of mine has a system that uses a ported midbass minimonitor underpinned by a big woofer tower much like Wison watt-puppy combo. The mini monitor runs full rage with the woofer tower which just comes in underneath. Blocking up the rear facing port on the top produces no audible tonal change to the system, but the soundstage shrinks markedly. Could this be a polar respose related effect, or a backwave phenomenon? There is more than just bass coming from the average port. I've never come up with a satisfactory explanation! |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
|
Hi Simon
Thats an interesting point re. the sound stage effect, I hadn't given any thought as to whether that had changed, I'm still recovering from novelty of listening to deep bass! I'm going to try stuffing some cardboard tubing into the holes I've drilled and then vary the length of them to see what difference it makes. It's like rocket science isn't it?
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Herefordshire
|
Well Rob, whatever works for you.. lol
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Lostwithiel, Cornwall
|
I havn't found any noticable difference in the soundstage, but maybe there is a little which is compensated by a better stereo image. I did find that the front port was improved by fitting a proper port with a sleeve. It improved the bass end even more. I tried to upload a picture but it was too big. Barry
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
|
You might want to look at my sims in the Onken thread.
http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/showt...76#post1753776 Front low vs. Rear high port. |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Lostwithiel, Cornwall
|
Thank you Panomaniac. Now that is a very interesting thread. I will have to take my time over it. I'm also interested in the Onkyo design, so will have a delve there also. I like to add that although my cabinets a big they are on stands, so the ports are nowhere near the floor. It was suggested in the thread that there is or maybe some relationship between low ports and the floor. This must have been a very time consuming project for you to present these simms. Well done, I have nothing but admiration for such work. Have a pint on me!! Barry
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Front or rear port placement? | JLC7 | Multi-Way | 14 | 26th May 2008 08:04 PM |
| Rear or front port? | Speek | Multi-Way | 1 | 7th September 2005 08:58 AM |
| front or rear port | blu_line | Multi-Way | 3 | 12th March 2004 01:20 PM |
| rear port vs front port | Jimmy154 | Multi-Way | 22 | 6th March 2004 08:38 AM |
| Rear vs. Front Port | squidbait | Multi-Way | 11 | 21st January 2004 12:10 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.12455 seconds (81.61% PHP - 18.39% MySQL) with 10 queries |