|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Switzerland
|
Though I use only boxes without "exhaust" nowadys I find this one quite interesting.
When I first saw a picture of a Dynacord Planar Waveguide I did somehow not like it. Specially the fact that it was a reflex box radiating into said waveguide. I then thought that it must be possible to build some type of bandpass by the use of a quarterwave resonator in the front of the driver and a reflex box at it's rear. The advantages would be that the reflex-box would be smaller than a tube (like used in the Acoustic Wave Cannon) and the quarterwave resonator giving higher SPLs than just a reflex box in front (like it is used in 6th order bandpasses). I then occasionally stumbled over the following Yamaha patent describing exactly what I was thinking of (though I don't like the particular designs shown in the patent): http://v3.espacenet.com/textdoc?DB=E...=US5313525&F=0 The biggest advantage is that the patent has ceased due to non payment of the fees. I never found the time to actually build one - but today I suddenly felt the urge to simulate one with "Hornresponse". I modelled a horn with just one conical section in the front having a veeeery low flare-rate. At the back it has a reflex chamber. The throat was slightly less than SD. A SD/Troat ratio around 1 looked the best in the simulations. The reflex box and the resonator are tuned slightly more than one octacve apart. The "driver" I used is just a hypothetical 15" one but maybe soemone is interested to try it with the parameters of a rel-world driver. The (simulated of course) response doesn't look too bad over the frequercy range where it acts as a bandpass. See the atrtached diagram. What do you think ? Regards Charles |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Novi, Michigan
|
This appears to be nothing more than a badely designed bandpass woofer.
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
|
Obviously, you are simply at a preliminary stage of the design. So I would ignore the previous insult.
It looks like an interesting analogy to TL design. So there would be all sorts of neat things to play with along with the taper(s). Hornresp is a very addictive piece of software isn't it? Good Luck and keep us up to date |
|
|
|
#4 | ||
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Switzerland
|
Quote:
Quote:
I am most probably not going to try it out by myself but wanted to present the principle here since there are always people who are interested in "loud but compact". Regards Charles |
||
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Novi, Michigan
|
Quote:
It was intended to be an insult but simply a note that this same response could be achieve very easily with a bandpass design with a long port. But these resonances are not desirable at all and making the port shorter and moving them up in frequency facilitates using a LP filter to get rid of them. You will have thus achieved exactly the same design that I use for virtually all of my subs. |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Western Sydney
|
The Karlson works like this too, (BR firing into a TL, which amounts to BP) but falls off on the low end due to the 'Karlson' slot along the length of the TL (has the same peaks in the highs too...)
__________________
Impedance varies with frequency, use impedance plots of your drivers and make crossover calculations using the actual impedance of the driver at the crossover frequency |
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Switzerland
|
Quote:
regards Charles |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Speakerholic
diyAudio Moderator
|
Now that's a funny typo.
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2006
|
[QUOTE]Originally posted by gedlee
[B] It was intended to be an insult but simply a note that this same response could be achieve very easily with a bandpass design with a long port. Paging Dr, Freud, We have a code blue!.......... |
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Slit cone principle?? | Elbert | Multi-Way | 11 | 18th December 2009 09:57 AM |
| Unipivot principle | peterr | Analogue Source | 6 | 11th July 2006 04:19 AM |
| The Translinear Principle | rtarbell | Everything Else | 0 | 6th April 2006 06:03 AM |
| Which principle should I prefer? | ChocoHolic | Subwoofers | 6 | 20th June 2004 10:56 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |