|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Columbus, OH
|
I purchased a boatload of Elemental Designs EHQS8 8" woofers a few months back for $5 each and am actually very impressed with them for what I paid. An honest 6mm xmax and some very impressive distortion measurements above 40 hz (mostly below 0.05%) that I took with Arta. I had an idea to build a pair of very inexpensive dipoles that could be crossed to a subwoofer and here's what I'm thinking. Four EHQS8s in the front and back of an enclosure wired out of phase. The front baffle will extend an additional 10"+ to allow for a dipole MT or MTM. Using a box instead of a typical U or H frame I'm hoping to gain the ability to cross over higher and avoid the peaks the other two formats are prone to. If I can get a healthy cross around 300-400 hz I could use smaller mids and alleviate some crossover component costs. Another nice thing I'm hoping this will give me is deeper bass, as I can build the enclosure quite large, increasing my effective path between sets of woofers. I'm thinking somewhere along the lines of 11-12" wide and up to 20" deep.
With that, can you see any flaws with doing this? Will I need to include some type of sound absorption for the internal waves? Thanks. It will look something like this, only larger:
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
|
Hi. I do believe your dipole idea would end up being a waste of power/money/time/space/etc. I was hesitant to post my opinion since I don't really have any supporting facts at the moment, but I do remember reading other threads regarding this in the past. Unfortunately, I can't seem to find them at the moment. Mainly, it seems to me as though the distance between the front and rear woofers would have to be much greater to obtain any of the possible benefits you're probably hoping for. I just don't think it'd work very well. The extra woofers could definitely be put to better use, and there are other ways of dealing with problems in the low frequencies besides limiting yourself to dipoles. Hopefully someone else will chime in with more answers..
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bucharest
|
Not really answers but a few comments:
- people have build "bipoles" before (drivers on both sides of enclosure) - some claim very good results - however not on bass: 2+2 8" woofers mounted as you say will simply not displace enough air IMHO. You need more driver area here ! - This does not mean that dipoles can't do bass - they do, and very good- but, as I said, you need a lot more area (see MJKs designs and technical studies)
__________________
I don't believe in audio believings. |
|
|
|
|
#4 | ||
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Columbus, OH
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
RIP
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: C'ville VA, USA
|
One thing a configuration like this can offer you is the ability to create a cardioid output by using a number of drivers that differ between front and rear, i.e., 4 front firing drivers and two rear firing drivers.
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Newcastle, Australia
|
I hope you have a very big room !!
If not, just use monopole vented or sealed bass with the MTM open. Also go to HTGuide and look for Jed's "Tombstone" speaker |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
|
Hi,
You could wire the bass units in phase as bipoles. Out of phase will simply not work very well. As bass bipoles it should be possible to smooth the cancellation from the rear wall somewhat. |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: UK
|
Distortion below 0.05% from a speaker??
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Columbus, OH
|
Quote:
My bad. I meant to type 0.5% |
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Karlson dipole sub - would it do any "good"? | freddi | Subwoofers | 10 | 21st November 2010 09:28 PM |
| DIY "speaker box" ("BOOM BOX"). Help needed. | MASantos | Full Range | 6 | 2nd September 2007 12:00 PM |
| any compromises in using Linkwitz W-frame dipole? | taloyd | Subwoofers | 9 | 6th July 2006 09:57 PM |
| How long can the rear wave of a dipole sub be "diverted" before... | 454Casull | Subwoofers | 0 | 31st May 2006 03:15 AM |
| What's that "blopping" sound coming out from my dipole? | sqlkev | Multi-Way | 29 | 2nd November 2005 01:36 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.12366 seconds (82.00% PHP - 18.00% MySQL) with 10 queries |