|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
|
http://www.partsexpress.com/pe/showd...number=264-837
Questions: 1) Is this driver still produced ? 2) What are your opinions/experiences to crossing it at 900-1000 Hz ? Cheers |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
|
The idea behind that is somewhat perverted:
W69-1042 could be dirt cheap killer applied to open baffle, when driven with a series resistor. The diaphragm seems capable to work properly in the midrange. Tangband offers some bass-mid units with similar diaphragm but different motor and suspension. Main reason for W69-1042 to be usable as subwoofer only is the very high voice coil inductivity (around 3,2mH) causing rolloff above 200 Hz. That seems to be the price to pay for the long throw voice coil design. Connecting a series resistor Qes is pushed up and the hump/rollof in frequency response should be smoothed. 4 of them have a cone area about 900cm2 ... and excursion is fairly high with Xmax of 7mm, maybe linear excursion is 4mm only i don'd know. It seems that the driver is still on shelf but it belongs to SU (Subwoofer) series now. The high voice coil inductivity could be used to design a crossover without external inductances using a capacitor only ... DisplacementVolume / Dollar ratio is is e x t r a o r d i n a r y good, and the quality of the driver is really ok, i use two of them as subwoofers in a BR design. Cheers Oliver |
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
Look at the submitted pictures: 1(5)-5(5). b 1(5) |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
2(5)
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
3(5)
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
4(5)
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
|
Thank you for your work !
I did not see the pictures immediately. But i think i would use a series resistor of higher value. And i will use 2 drivers, which will have higher directivity then. There will be around 50 cm distance to the floor. |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
5(5)
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
|
This is the OB design (just a thought)
OB concept study using inexpensive bass drivers Your graphs show, that early rolloff > 300Hz is mainly introduced by combination of baffle step and crossover ... This can be circumvented by using different baffle size and positioning of drivers. Crossover has to be adapted too. |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Hi Oliver,
Since I’ve studied your other tread I tend to agree with your comments and as someone noticed in that tread: a simulation parameter mistake must exist when comparing to the parameter settings using only one driver, I’ve taken action to correct this discrepancy too. See the pictures in 1(9)-7(9) b 1(9)- 7(9) |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| fs tang band w4-1320 and w69-1042 - uk or europe | needmorstuff | Swap Meet | 2 | 14th January 2009 08:21 AM |
| Modified Ratshack 40-1042 Openbaffle | larc99 | Full Range | 0 | 2nd February 2008 04:04 AM |
| 6Н28Б-В datasheet? | mark_titano | Tubes / Valves | 1 | 25th August 2005 10:12 PM |
| Modified RB300 & Goldring 1042 | carl loller | Analogue Source | 6 | 5th October 2004 04:24 AM |
| Tangband W69-1042 Groupbuy | Lusso5 | Swap Meet | 0 | 12th January 2004 07:25 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.10266 seconds (77.58% PHP - 22.42% MySQL) with 11 queries |