|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
As I had mentioned last time, I had another pair of enclosures from the M&K bankruptcy buyout which used larger drivers. I think they were meant for a 6" stamped steel frame midbass, their flared square frame dome tweeter, and a pair of peerless or vifa full range 3" drivers on each side. Since the tweeter cutout really wouldn't fit a normal 1" round dome, I decided just to buy the over priced (IMO) M&K tweeters off the web, and at closer examination, I would say they are made by Peerless (The dome/coils look identical), and appears to be based on peerless's own flared tweeter, but I believe made to a lower price point. I chose a Vifa Logic BC14SG69-04 truncated 5" midbass driver, which fit very nicely into the hole, as you will see. For the side drivers I chose the new Peerless 3" full range aluminum cone 830986, which I truly love.
The crossover is a simple 2nd order butterworth design. I kept things simple since I didn't want to spend too much on the project, over complicate the crossover, or reduce efficiency too much. Additionally, the midbass doesn't measure great in its upper range, and would require a notch filter and 3rd order crossover to truely flatten things out. I listened both ways and decided it wasn't worth the hassle and expense. I also didn't account for the coil losses of the 20 guage inductors, as I used 12 guage cfac's durring my testing, and will probably pad the tweeter down a bit more later on. However, it really doesn't sound that poorly balanced, just not as natural as my reference.
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
I will post the crossover schematic I used in this one later if people want. Again, I'm a bit surprised there is no interest in a good surround speaker design like this. This is a solid inexpensive surround speaker that we know would have sold for ~700-1200 dollars a pair (Considering the price of M&K speakers and the improved drivers in this design). Even without the enclosures I got, these could be built pretty easily. I weighed them, since they are being wall mounted, and are around 15lbs each, so pretty substantial little speakers.
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
For all the images it says "unavailable", could you fix them?
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
apparently flickr doesn't allow you to host images from flickr on other webpages without linking it back to flickr. However, when I put the code they give me into this, it doesn't keep it as an image, just as the script. I'm not sure what else I can do, the images are too large. Lets see if what I have done worked, if not, then I will try another method. Sorry for this.
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| axial surround instead of radial surround | Calvin | Subwoofers | 22 | 13th July 2009 06:46 PM |
| New surround project-Tripole clone? | pjpoes | Multi-Way | 11 | 6th May 2008 09:27 PM |
| Question regarding ProAc 2.5 Clone and Tempo 2 Clone | zoooh | Multi-Way | 5 | 11th March 2003 08:19 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.09291 seconds (76.68% PHP - 23.32% MySQL) with 10 queries |