Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Multi-Way
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 4th June 2008, 10:00 PM   #1
pjpoes is offline pjpoes  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: New York
Send a message via AIM to pjpoes
Default Tripole surround Clone #2

As I had mentioned last time, I had another pair of enclosures from the M&K bankruptcy buyout which used larger drivers. I think they were meant for a 6" stamped steel frame midbass, their flared square frame dome tweeter, and a pair of peerless or vifa full range 3" drivers on each side. Since the tweeter cutout really wouldn't fit a normal 1" round dome, I decided just to buy the over priced (IMO) M&K tweeters off the web, and at closer examination, I would say they are made by Peerless (The dome/coils look identical), and appears to be based on peerless's own flared tweeter, but I believe made to a lower price point. I chose a Vifa Logic BC14SG69-04 truncated 5" midbass driver, which fit very nicely into the hole, as you will see. For the side drivers I chose the new Peerless 3" full range aluminum cone 830986, which I truly love.

The crossover is a simple 2nd order butterworth design. I kept things simple since I didn't want to spend too much on the project, over complicate the crossover, or reduce efficiency too much. Additionally, the midbass doesn't measure great in its upper range, and would require a notch filter and 3rd order crossover to truely flatten things out. I listened both ways and decided it wasn't worth the hassle and expense. I also didn't account for the coil losses of the 20 guage inductors, as I used 12 guage cfac's durring my testing, and will probably pad the tweeter down a bit more later on. However, it really doesn't sound that poorly balanced, just not as natural as my reference.Click the image to open in full size. Click the image to open in full size. Click the image to open in full size.
  Reply With Quote
Old 5th June 2008, 02:42 PM   #2
pjpoes is offline pjpoes  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: New York
Send a message via AIM to pjpoes
I will post the crossover schematic I used in this one later if people want. Again, I'm a bit surprised there is no interest in a good surround speaker design like this. This is a solid inexpensive surround speaker that we know would have sold for ~700-1200 dollars a pair (Considering the price of M&K speakers and the improved drivers in this design). Even without the enclosures I got, these could be built pretty easily. I weighed them, since they are being wall mounted, and are around 15lbs each, so pretty substantial little speakers.
  Reply With Quote
Old 6th June 2008, 04:56 PM   #3
diyAudio Member
 
critofur's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Columbus, OH
Send a message via AIM to critofur Send a message via MSN to critofur Send a message via Yahoo to critofur
For all the images it says "unavailable", could you fix them?
__________________
Critofur
http://www.ohmspeakers.com <- all the folks here are my friends
  Reply With Quote
Old 8th June 2008, 08:20 PM   #4
pjpoes is offline pjpoes  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: New York
Send a message via AIM to pjpoes
Click the image to open in full size.
  Reply With Quote
Old 8th June 2008, 08:25 PM   #5
pjpoes is offline pjpoes  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: New York
Send a message via AIM to pjpoes
apparently flickr doesn't allow you to host images from flickr on other webpages without linking it back to flickr. However, when I put the code they give me into this, it doesn't keep it as an image, just as the script. I'm not sure what else I can do, the images are too large. Lets see if what I have done worked, if not, then I will try another method. Sorry for this.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
axial surround instead of radial surround Calvin Subwoofers 22 13th July 2009 06:46 PM
New surround project-Tripole clone? pjpoes Multi-Way 11 6th May 2008 09:27 PM
Question regarding ProAc 2.5 Clone and Tempo 2 Clone zoooh Multi-Way 5 11th March 2003 08:19 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 08:19 PM.

Page generated in 0.09291 seconds (76.68% PHP - 23.32% MySQL) with 10 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio