|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Brighton
|
I have designed the following 2-way crossover for a woofer+mid bass guitar cab:
Series Inductor on Woofer: 1.9mH (2nd order Butterworth) Parallel Cap on Woofer: 22uF Series Cap on Midrange: 22uF (2nd order Butterworth) Parallel Inductor on Mid: 2mH Series RC Parallel to Midrange: 10uF and 8.2ohms (Zobel) Series RL Parallel to Midrange: 0.6mH and 3.3ohms (Resonance peak correction) I expect the speaker to be used with amps up to 1000W though that kind of power is very unlikely to be sustained due to the dynamic nature of bass guitar and live music. Maybe the cab will see 50-100W average with peaks up to 1000W+. I'm intending to use a 15 gauge P-core plus discs inductor in series with the woofer but I'm don't know how low a gauge I can safely use on the two shunt inductors on the midrange. Any answers? Thanks, Alex |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Brighton
|
Anyone?
Thanks! Alex |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
For that kind of power you will want to stay with 15-12 guage. I would stay away from standard iron core because of core saturation, but would consider something like a pcore, Erse Super Q, or the C-core toroidal inductors. All of which will not saturate as easily and can handle considerable power. None are rated for 1000 watts, but as you say, the speakers will likely never see 1000 watts sustained, so it isn't a big issue. I would mount the crossovers externally though, as it will make repairs quicker in the event that an inductor does get fried. It also allows air to circulate around the components better.
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
|
Hi,
All those parallel components on the midrange do sound like a good idea, especially the RL with R=3.3R. The Zobel on the midrange is not needed, whilst omitting it for the bass unit means the "textbook" 2nd order c/o function will not be accurate for it. There is a lot to be said for a simple 1st order series crossover with just 2 components for this application - as it is resilient to driver impedance variation, cheap and does not waste power. Values for 1khz / 8ohm are 1.3mH and 20uF. /sreten.
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Brighton
|
Quote:
Is there anything in particular I should be aware of with such a 1st order series design? Alex |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
|
Hi,
It depends on the intended c/o point and the details of the two drivers. /sreten.
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Brighton
|
Quote:
Alex |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
|
Hi,
With ~ 6dB slopes the midrange will still increase in excursion until it hits its its bass roll-off, in other words it should be tuned to a Qts of at least 0.7, or possibly somewhat higher, up to 0.95 (1dB ripple) to maximise the frequency where excursion will begin decreasing. I'm not sure what the best arrangement is for those two drivers, or that they are a particulary good combination, the Eminence has issues around 1.5 kHz that sort of implies it will mess up the midrange of a separate unit if a simple c/o is used. The Deltalite for example looks easier to crossover. /sreten.
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Sunny Tustin, SoCal
|
Quote:
Jeeze man! That's a heck of a high crossover point for a 6.5", high efficiency prostyle or not. The 15" will be well into breakup at 1kHz, and will have beaming and off axis lobing like crazy. Even the .5mm Xmax Audax PR17OMO has recommended XO to a midbass transducer at around 500 (or lower) with a 12dB slope. Headroom is a lovely thing to have, but I think you're taking the power handling requirements very extremely.
__________________
I write for www.enjoythemusic.com in the DIY section. You may find yourself getting a preview of a project in-progress. Be warned! |
|
|
|
|
#10 | |||
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Brighton
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I'm now experimenting with a conventional 2nd order crossover with full impedance correction. Due to the output of the midrange diminishing as it goes lower it seems very difficult to get the woofer/mid output to acoustically cross lower than 1kHz even though for this version of the crossover I have the woofer lowpass at ~800Hz and the mid highpass at ~500Hz. Alex |
|||
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Impedance correction for old Fe103 (zobel) | TKsys | Full Range | 2 | 20th March 2007 06:09 PM |
| Increasing inductor impedance. | Tor M | Multi-Way | 2 | 2nd April 2005 07:54 PM |
| How much do you focus on impedance correction? | mr_push_pull | Multi-Way | 12 | 8th October 2004 02:22 AM |
| Impedance correction | Ralph | Multi-Way | 2 | 15th August 2003 09:25 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |