Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Multi-Way
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 3rd May 2008, 09:34 PM   #1
Klimon is offline Klimon  Belgium
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Leuven
Default North Creek D28 + Peerless Hds-164 Nomex

Hello,

I'ld like to rebuild a lovely pair of transmissionlines (first ones I built) with the peerless hds-164 nomex (which has the right specs for the cabinets) + North Creek D28 I purchased.... Do you think these can be paired using a first order crossover?

Muchos gracias,

Simon
  Reply With Quote
Old 4th May 2008, 08:41 AM   #2
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: alsace
Default Re: North Creek D28 + Peerless Hds-164 Nomex

Quote:
Originally posted by Klimon
Hello,

... hds-164 nomex (which has the right specs for the cabinets) + North Creek D28 I purchased.... Do you think these can be paired using a first order crossover?

Muchos gracias,

Simon
Yes, I don't see any reason you couldn't, however take care on Fx, even this tweeter doesn't love high levels with such a resulting feable slope. Shouldn't need a Zobel.

__________________
crazyhub
  Reply With Quote
Old 5th May 2008, 06:39 PM   #3
Klimon is offline Klimon  Belgium
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Leuven
Fantastic! That should make things doable for me (my ears are my best testing equipment). Would you give an educated guess about crossover frequency? On the previous two-ways I tinkered with I had best results laying the - 3db point of the tweets a couple of khz above that of the woofers. E.g. in this case I'ld probably start with 1,5k for the woofers and 3,5k for the tweeters. Your opinion is much appreciated.

Cheers,

Simon
  Reply With Quote
Old 6th May 2008, 08:55 AM   #4
sreten is offline sreten  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
Default Re: North Creek D28 + Peerless Hds-164 Nomex

Quote:
Originally posted by Klimon

... Do you think these can be paired using a first order crossover?
Simon
Hi,

In a word no. Not properly.

http://www.rjbaudio.com/Audiofiles/FRDtools.html
http://www.geocities.com/woove99/Spkrbldg/

/sreten.
__________________
There is nothing so practical as a really good theory - Ludwig Boltzmann
When your only tool is a hammer, every problem looks like a nail - Abraham Maslow
  Reply With Quote
Old 6th May 2008, 12:23 PM   #5
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: alsace
Default Re: Re: North Creek D28 + Peerless Hds-164 Nomex

Quote:
Originally posted by sreten


Hi,

In a word no. Not properly.

/sreten.
I guess because of the un-possibility to get correct mismatched phases with first-order x-over regarding the shape of the woofer in its upper-range, isn't it?


__________________
crazyhub
  Reply With Quote
Old 6th May 2008, 01:21 PM   #6
sreten is offline sreten  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
Default Re: Re: Re: North Creek D28 + Peerless Hds-164 Nomex

Quote:
Originally posted by crazyhub

I guess because of the un-possibility to get correct mismatched phases with
first-order x-over regarding the shape of the woofer in its upper-range, isn't it?

Hi,

Simply put you do not know the resulting acoustic order of
your crossover slopes and hence phase matching. There are also
issues of BSC (baffle step compensation) and tweeter distortion.

www.zaphaudio.com is as good as any regarding croosovers.

/sreten.
__________________
There is nothing so practical as a really good theory - Ludwig Boltzmann
When your only tool is a hammer, every problem looks like a nail - Abraham Maslow
  Reply With Quote
Old 6th May 2008, 02:41 PM   #7
Klimon is offline Klimon  Belgium
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Leuven
Thanks for the hints

Simon
  Reply With Quote
Old 6th May 2008, 03:33 PM   #8
diyAudio Member
 
Inductor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Cascais
Quote:
Originally posted by Klimon
Thanks for the hints

Simon
Do you have the drivers already? (You have North D28.)
The SS 6-1/2" Midwoofer 18W/8545K00 is also a great speaker driver.
  Reply With Quote
Old 6th May 2008, 03:35 PM   #9
sreten is offline sreten  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
Hi,

There seems to be a number of HDS164 driver models .....

http://www.northcreekmusic.com/Drivers/NorthD28-06S.PDF

Suggests 2nd order electrical on the tweeter at around 2Khz.
Efficiency will be low so due to L-pad values you likely will not
need the additional parallel LCR for the D28's impedance peak.

This suggests to me your target is the classic 4th order L/R with
some assymetry to manipulate the phase due to driver offsets.

/sreten.
__________________
There is nothing so practical as a really good theory - Ludwig Boltzmann
When your only tool is a hammer, every problem looks like a nail - Abraham Maslow
  Reply With Quote
Old 6th May 2008, 04:34 PM   #10
Klimon is offline Klimon  Belgium
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Leuven
Quote:
The SS 6-1/2" Midwoofer 18W/8545K00 is also a great speaker driver.
The Peerless has T/S specs that would be suited for the existing enclosere, anyway I don't have to check the SS price to know I can't afford it

Quote:
...Suggests 2nd order electrical on the tweeter at around 2Khz.
In the application notes there's something about a certain ratio between L and C (forming the second order low-pass) which they recommend; on investigating George Short from northcreek informed me that on their commercial speakers with D28 they use that ratio e.g. Kitti Cat 11µF and 0,315mH (more info on that crossover is on their website) ; Eska 7µ and 0,5m. Adding: The correct choice of C and L depend on the net tweeter + L-pad resistance. For a higher net impedance, C gets smaller and L gets bigger. For a lower net impedance, C gets larger and L gets smaller. Apparently that ratio sounds best for the D28; Kitty Cat has Fx 1,65 and acoustical 3rd order highpass mated with electrical 2nd order for the midwoofer which results in 3rd order lowpass also. Ideally I'ld like to use that ratio for the tweeters X-overs but I'ld probably need to use simulation software for determining the precise value given the specific L-pad needed for matching the hds164. See here: http://www.northcreekmusic.com/Kitty..._Kat_Info.htms given I'll investigate further later on, meanwhile any input is welcome.

Cheers,

Simon
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
WTB: 6 North Creek d25's bhg41088 Swap Meet 0 29th December 2004 08:37 AM
north creek d28 pxr5 Multi-Way 4 1st November 2004 05:15 PM
North Creek Danse Multi-Way 0 7th October 2004 10:39 PM
DIY HT - North Creek vs. E-Speakers smithsonga Multi-Way 3 23rd December 2003 07:36 AM
North Creek D25-06S tweeters? Oz_Audio Multi-Way 1 16th December 2002 08:23 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 10:57 AM.

Page generated in 0.11842 seconds (78.36% PHP - 21.64% MySQL) with 11 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio