|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#31 |
|
Speakerholic
diyAudio Moderator
|
The kits are available and if you replace surrounds for a living, the 18 drivers will be no problem. My concern when considering the undertaking is how will the first driver compare with the last if you're a hobbiest.
|
|
|
|
|
#32 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Ste-Therese, Quebec
|
This project went the back shelf....but still very "mind" active.
Back in november took many test readings with different cone weighings using 1 to 5 size 3/0 split shots (fishing sinkers)..concluding that weight mods for the 901-2 drivers would not be that beneficial towards designing a compact TL speaker. Also the same weight mods towards recycling these into sealed boxes gave results like: With 4 lead sinkers (0.72 grams/sinker): Fs 55 hz (no mods = 78) Qm 2.76 (2.46) Qe 0.58 (0.44) Qt 0.476 (0.372) Re 7 ohms Vas 7.9L L 0.24mH Best F3 is 89 hz in 4.1L box with heavy fill, no leaks and Qtc 0.7 Without mods best F3 was 166 hz with Vb at 1.8 L (heavy fill, no leaks) The 901-2 as designed by BOSE simulates as follows using Unibox (freeware): Vb 20L, heavy fill, no leaks, 9 drivers (3 paralleled series of 3) F3 164 hz Fb 154 hz Qtc 0.661 Max power input 465 watts SPL at 1W/1M 101 dB / 118 dB at 50 Watts Driver ratings worked out at: each driver at 30 Watts...music rating =270 Watts / 125 dB at 1 kz/ 116 dB at 100 hz / 90 db at 20 hz. each at 5.5 Watts for continuous sinewave = 50 watts All simulations done without the electronic signal booster. Here are the output graphs using Unibox (excellent software)
__________________
All those "bits" give me indigestion!
|
|
|
|
|
#33 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Ste-Therese, Quebec
|
Attempts with *.gif attachments not successful.....any suggestions?
__________________
All those "bits" give me indigestion!
|
|
|
|
|
#34 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Knoxville, TN
|
Has anyone ever found a frequency response graph of any series 901? This has always been a heated discussion point as Bose would never provide one. I have searched some but only found one somebody did outside in a garden so not exactly optimal. I'm curious to know what range they do cover well and where they roll off.
|
|
|
|
|
#35 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Ste-Therese, Quebec
|
901.Fixer
There is a summary of a frequency response test published in Stereo Review (70's). Testing was performed by the "Hirsch-Houck Laboratories. I made a 576 kbts pdf copy of the article which I am mailing you...tried to place here but weighs more than the 102.4 Kbts limit imposed here. Louis
__________________
All those "bits" give me indigestion!
|
|
|
|
|
#36 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Knoxville, TN
|
Thank you Sir.
My current project uses a pair of 901/VI as though they are just wide mid range speakers supplemented with a 15" Selenium ProAudio woofer and Linaeum di-pole ribbon tweeter. I see you email. I'll check it now so I have a better idea of where the crossover points are gonna be. |
|
|
|
|
#37 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
|
Quote:
![]() The only drawback with this set up is that the room looks like a club now with those big speakers. I'm also using heavy gauge speaker wires for all speakers. Hope your Dad enjoys them. My dad did not have a chance to hear mine. His time ran out.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#38 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
|
I like what you've done with these. Do they have a sheer/metal grill? I can't tell from the photo/my monitor. I picked up a pair for 50 bucks a few months back. I wanted something that played loud and could hang from the ceiling in my work out room. I tried them in a listening room when I first got them home. They sounded quite a bit less than OK. The amp I had hooked them up too was likely too small. I'm sure part of the problem is age, although the EQ had just been refurbished by the factory a few years back. They were set up per the manual. In the workout room with a 60watt 20 year old integrated amp and the EQ, hanging high and playing loud rock while I work out they ARE PERFECT! I'd have to say they have motivated me to workout more often. They beat the heck out of using mini monitors or headphones. I bought a second pair as I'm planning on stacking them and hooking them up to a serious pro use power (500 - 100watt) amp for the occassional party. I may even hook them up to my alarm system.
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| foam surround repair video? | unpredictable | Multi-Way | 6 | 9th April 2009 03:58 AM |
| Alternate surround repair method | mashaffer | Multi-Way | 2 | 12th September 2006 03:04 AM |
| 'New Advent' surround replacement, anyone done it? | gmarsh | Multi-Way | 3 | 1st September 2004 11:08 PM |
| where can i get some replacement cones for my bose............... | philj | Parts | 2 | 9th December 2003 11:48 PM |
| subwoofer surround repair | jbrom | Subwoofers | 0 | 3rd March 2002 10:55 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.12371 seconds (81.00% PHP - 19.00% MySQL) with 10 queries |