Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Multi-Way
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 6th November 2008, 04:23 PM   #21
Speakerholic
diyAudio Moderator
 
Cal Weldon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: British Columbia
No we don't.
__________________
Next stop: Margaritaville
Some of Cal's stuff | Cal Weldon Consulting
  Reply With Quote
Old 6th November 2008, 04:27 PM   #22
Speakerholic
diyAudio Moderator
 
Cal Weldon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: British Columbia
Default Re: Bose 901 drivers

Quote:
Originally posted by TICUL38
Re=7.0 ohms
Interesting. When did Bose switch to a more conventional motor? The only 901 drivers I have come across were 1 ohm, all wired in series.

EDIT: I am wondering if those drivers are from the 800 series, the ones used for small PA duty. IIRC those were 8 ohms and the boxes were very similar to the 901's
__________________
Next stop: Margaritaville
Some of Cal's stuff | Cal Weldon Consulting
  Reply With Quote
Old 6th November 2008, 09:57 PM   #23
TICUL38 is offline TICUL38  Canada
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Ste-Therese, Quebec
Default 7 Ohms it is

The pair of 901-II that I took apart are S/N 166414 (M.O. 2287) & 166510 (M.O. 2288).
The 7 ohm drivers were wired three parralleled series strings of three. I recall someone suggesting 1 ohm drivers...possibly adavancing a rumour without first checking.
The parameters mentioned earlier are per driver. I never bothered measuring the speaker's frequency/impedance signatures because that would not have been productive for me after the "disapointing" listening tests.
P.S. I dont recall "bashing" Bose in my first post, so please dont read into any post what's not there.
__________________
All those "bits" give me indigestion!
  Reply With Quote
Old 6th November 2008, 10:20 PM   #24
Speakerholic
diyAudio Moderator
 
Cal Weldon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: British Columbia
Hi Louis,

If you have a series II then you have 4 bolt hole, cloth surround, blue cone drivers correct?

They were last made in 1976. From then on (series III and up) they used foam surrounds and at one point reduced it to 3 bolt holes. No where can I find any bose 901 driver that is other than 1 ohm. I wonder if your drivers have been renewed. If so they must have used the 800 series drivers.

Cheers.

EDIT: I think I spoke too soon. I did a little research and found the series I & II drivers were in fact 8 ohms, wired as you have described. Sorry for the diversion. We now return to your regularly scheduled programming.
__________________
Next stop: Margaritaville
Some of Cal's stuff | Cal Weldon Consulting
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th November 2008, 11:06 PM   #25
TICUL38 is offline TICUL38  Canada
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Ste-Therese, Quebec
INDUCTOR ...you posted:

{{i'm interested in knowing the t/s parameters for one (of those) driver(s) only, and output/impedance in freq. (/graphs), for those people that want to find one to build a similar speaker. Thanks}}

I will go a distance with you on this, with a open baffle frequency/impedance graph for a "single" driver. I am curious though why you wish to duplicate a BOSE 901 design? Dont forget you would have to acquire a series of 18 duplicate drivers (+spares) for a stereo pair. I am all for the "ambiphonic" sound the 901 was designed for, and in fact I am concentrating design time with that approach of music/TV sound reproduction in mind, since IMO it provides the most natural rendition of music/sound in my space. Also, the focused in your face speaker boxes do not fit my listening/viewing room unless I forego peace of mind with my mate!

...and Cal, you posted:

{{If you have a series II then you have 4 bolt hole, cloth surround, blue cone drivers correct?}}

The drivers I have here are the 4-mounting hole vintage, with the Bose name printed on a blue paper cone. In passing, the frame vibrates like hell in vicinity of resonance, so will require damping with some mastic molded into the magnet-frame crease, and possibly onto the frame spiders. I still dont know if I will be passing these drivers onto the obsolete shelf....have to do a trial run somehow. Also, glad to read you cleared up the 1 Ohm dingy...could not imagine a driver manufacturer accepting to give birth to a 1 Ohm "runt"...
__________________
All those "bits" give me indigestion!
  Reply With Quote
Old 11th November 2008, 11:01 AM   #26
diyAudio Member
 
Inductor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Cascais
Default Ticul38

Hi,
Just to make sure you have and/or use the BOSE processor for the boosted limit frequencies with your BOSE speakers (?).

I am not interested in building a copy physically -- that would be interesting but costs (a lot of) money -- but in the process and philosophie behind it's construction and it's quality of sound, and calibration. It's a long process for that speaker to the point where it arrived to the maket and played in discos at a very high SPL.
  Reply With Quote
Old 16th November 2008, 11:28 PM   #27
TICUL38 is offline TICUL38  Canada
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Ste-Therese, Quebec
Hello Inductor,
Listening test was done without the BOSE Equalizer in play.
My first objective was to get around that "boxy sound" detected in the midrange, which from experience is mostly attributed to "paper cone transparency" to internal reflections escaping and muddying the resolution. I did not want to succumb to my usual enthusiastic way of proceeding with a vintage acquisition...and so decided to research/correct in steps, and then re-evaluate the midrange before checking how the equalizer impacts on sound quality. I kept in mind that driving the cones harder pulls them into a non-linear coil/field region...and that is what this equalizer will likely do. Loudness will bury distortion as the brain wants to shut off the ears. Soooo, I shall correct the cones/surrounds to make them as opake as possible, and then check out the midrange again.
Will report results later. I am currently overwhelmed in putting together a more accurate frequency counter ...need 0.1Hz resolution for more accurate Qe, Qm measurements.
__________________
All those "bits" give me indigestion!
  Reply With Quote
Old 18th November 2008, 10:26 PM   #28
diyAudio Member
 
Inductor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Cascais
From what I understand, it can not work without the equalizer. Unless you use another similar equalizer, with stepped bass and treble, or, with passive xovers at the same critical frequencies, or, active amps with stepped curves. Also there is a dip for the ressonance, maybe similar as the one in the open baffle speakers. note I don't know them and I never tested them, just from the papers on the speakers. Also don't get confused, they were the best speakers in "small discos" around, for me, at the time.
  Reply With Quote
Old 28th April 2009, 02:54 AM   #29
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
this is an old thread but I wanted to bump it to say thanks!

I personally don't care for the 901s... but my father has always loved them, he talked about getting a set all the time and eventually bought a new pair several years ago... he recently lost his job and had to sell almost everything he owns to stay afloat including his 901s.

a member of my car club was cleaning out his garage and had an old set of series IV 901s up for sale for $20. I though it would be a great fathers day gift if I bought them and fixed them up a bit.

Of course upon pulling off the tweed grills the speaker foam was all rotted way.

I was searching for whole replacement drivers when good 'ol diyaudio came up with this thread... I never knew they made repair kits for the foam surrounds

I'm sure the $$ could be better spent building a nicer pair of speakers, but the 901s have some kind of sentimental value for my father so I figured it was worth it.

After fixing the drivers I'll probably sand down and paint the enclosures black and then work out some better looking grill material to replace the 70s tweed.

The speakers did come with the equalizer and it is much needed. If my memory serves you can use the speakers without the equalizer, Bose even sells them separate from the equalizer but they "require" that the equalizer be used at all times with the speakers. They sound like tin-can speakers with out it... but they do have a very warm and inviting (albeit horribly inaccurate) sound when the equalizer is in use.
  Reply With Quote
Old 28th April 2009, 04:02 AM   #30
diyAudio Member
 
tomtt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: kansas city mo, and on occasion, around the world ...
Blog Entries: 15
Quote:
Originally posted by twistedsymphony


had to sell almost everything he owns to stay afloat including his 901s.

it would be a great fathers day gift, if I bought them and fixed them up a bit.


Certainly Would.



listening with BoSe, is better than not listening, at all ...
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
foam surround repair video? unpredictable Multi-Way 6 9th April 2009 03:58 AM
Alternate surround repair method mashaffer Multi-Way 2 12th September 2006 03:04 AM
'New Advent' surround replacement, anyone done it? gmarsh Multi-Way 3 1st September 2004 11:08 PM
where can i get some replacement cones for my bose............... philj Parts 2 9th December 2003 11:48 PM
subwoofer surround repair jbrom Subwoofers 0 3rd March 2002 10:55 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 05:45 PM.

Page generated in 0.13573 seconds (79.53% PHP - 20.47% MySQL) with 10 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio