|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#11 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: home sweet home
|
you are right mhtplsh
i was refering to parts exspress kit ed |
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Laputa
|
Why not repair and sell them? Surely you will get more than $50??
sp |
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
Four of these midwoofers for MTM (perhaps dipole): http://madisound.secureserverdot.com...oducts_id=1757 Two of these tweeters: http://madisound.secureserverdot.com...oducts_id=1496 Two 8" woofers for "bass bins" lower low freq. cabinets, perhaps these?: http://www.partsexpress.com/pe/showd...number=299-826 The most expensive parts might end up being inductors, to save money, find some big AC motor being discarded (not too hard if you live in a big city and just watch the sidewalks for such things being thrown out) then salvage the wire and wind your own inductors. I know with the price of copper having gone up so much such things are harder to come by recently though. If you keep looking, eventually you can find some discarded copper wire... Lots of people throw out furniture, you could use discarded drawer units/kitchen cabinets, etc. for the wood to build your cabinets to save money... And, you could probably build something that sounds better than your typical $2,500 store bought speakers. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Silicon Valley
|
An old 901 is a great period piece. Especially if you have the funkey stands. I actually added Vifa 1" silk dome tweeters to mine and don't use the processor. They certainly don't have the fidelity of modern speakers so I keep them out in the back yard in the greenhouse. For a few bucks for foam surounds, latex glue and an afternoon, you'll have some rockin' party speakers. Remember, the flat sides go to the room and the 8 drivers on the back bounce off the wall.
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Cascais
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
|
__________________
There is nothing so practical as a really good theory - Ludwig Boltzmann |
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: home sweet home
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Ste-Therese, Quebec
|
Any further research/repairs done by the the originator on this thread?
FWIW, I recently listened to a pair of 901-II using both an Accuphase E-202 and a Mosfet moded Dynakit ST-120 Amplifiers...these clearly revealed the limitations in the 901 box/driver combo. Can't point any fingers to Bose, but need to admit the 70's technology/knowledge base on hand to put together sound boxes cannot compete with what you can do today with relatively less investment. Speaker design technology is now at the point where anyone so inspired can put together some pretty decent sound reproducers..question is how can one be certain of starting off with "good" drivers. The Bose 901 series II drivers (all 18 of them from two boxes) are only good to experiment with. The ones I extracted from my boxes have been tested for TS parameters..since I plan to put together something different than the 901 style acoustic suspension box for these drivers. So far, I have just started considering what mods I need to make on the drivers...since these have cloth surrounds (Bose slightly sealed the cloth with a tacky substance), and paper cones that need to be sealed. The listening session at the onset indicated a mid frequency boxy sound and lack of the high end response....both of which, IMO, should not be "improved" electronically using the 901 Active Equalizer (my ear-brain link does not like). FYI, the drivers have Fs around 75Hz, Re=7.0 ohms, Vas=6 to 7.5L, Qe=0.34, Qm=1.6, Le=0.45 mH, ...these are average values I will probably add weight to the diaphragms in search of a lower Fs (PVA coating and split lead sinkers as used many times by John Crawford reporting in Speaker Builder). If interest appears, I will follow with progress in due time...I am running many rabbits (retiree) Louis
__________________
All those "bits" give me indigestion!
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Cascais
|
i'm interested in knowing the t/s parameters for one (of those) driver(s) only, and output/impedance in freq. (/graphs), for those people that want to find one to build a similar speaker. Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
#20 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| foam surround repair video? | unpredictable | Multi-Way | 6 | 9th April 2009 03:58 AM |
| Alternate surround repair method | mashaffer | Multi-Way | 2 | 12th September 2006 03:04 AM |
| 'New Advent' surround replacement, anyone done it? | gmarsh | Multi-Way | 3 | 1st September 2004 11:08 PM |
| where can i get some replacement cones for my bose............... | philj | Parts | 2 | 9th December 2003 11:48 PM |
| subwoofer surround repair | jbrom | Subwoofers | 0 | 3rd March 2002 10:55 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.12318 seconds (81.39% PHP - 18.61% MySQL) with 10 queries |