|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
|
830883, 830884 or ER18 ?
If you were to build a high value system today with a Seas tweeter, which driver would you chose and why? Mo |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
|
Hi,
The 8" 830884 needs a much larger enclosure than the other two. Of the 6.5"s the Seas has better documentation and consistency. None of them are a bad choice. Depends what you want .... |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
|
So true about the enclosure size but I'm not concerned with that at all. Just looking for "best sound" for a 2-way use.... ad to that consistency and ease to develop an x-over... any opinions?
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: ONTARIO CANADA
|
I personally like the 883 because the crossover is easier to design than with the breakup of the 884. Yes the seas finish quality is a bit higher but u wont have anything bad enough to affect performance. The motor on the 883 is also brilliant as no zobel is needed. Distortion averages about the same between the seas and peerless tho. So either way id stick with the smaller drivers. Seas if you need its looks, build quality and sensitivity only. But otherwise the peerless is the way to go.
__________________
The bitterness of poor quality is remembered long after the sweetness of low prices is forgotten. |
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
|
Rounder, Sreten,
thank you both for the replies. I've read good things about Zaph's designs and his site is where I found all these drivers.... Is the 830884 8" worth the hassle for the extra base it can produce? Should the mids be as clear at the 7" drivers? Is the 830883 not better then the ER18 from 500hz and up? Maybe a better match for the super clean Seas tweeters? Found some designs that use the Ushers, Are the Ushers worth the extra money and how do they fit in all this? Mo |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
|
Hi,
Only you can answer most of those questions. VFM wise and self build the 8" is the most cost effective compared to the cost of an equivalent commercial offering, which would be ~ twice the size and price of the 6.5" models. However "ease of c/o development" is an issue. If you cannot do it properly use an existing design. Arguing the pro's and con's of very good drivers is fairly pointless. They define the quality you can get at certain price points. Zaph's value ratings I'd say are worth noting. |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
|
Ok, I like the added base of the 830884 and the high sensitivity.
If I were to go along with that 8", when would "beaming" come into play? I've read about that but I still don't understand it. Mo |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
|
Interesting read regarding smallish woofers : http://www.linkwitzlab.com/frontiers.htm#J
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
|
Quote:
Short answer is no. Especially with a sub 2kHz c/o point. |
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| tweeter advice for peerless 830883 | flexus | Multi-Way | 47 | 30th December 2009 09:24 PM |
| Vented box volume needed for Peerless 830884 8" | duffsag2468 | Multi-Way | 3 | 22nd July 2008 10:43 AM |
| peerless 830883 Question | mbutzkies | Multi-Way | 0 | 9th January 2007 03:11 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.13531 seconds (66.65% PHP - 33.35% MySQL) with 10 queries |