|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
|
In my four ways system I want make a passive line level crossover (pllxo) to compare with my active xo now I use. Since the frequency cut are first order 200h-1000-5000hz I have to use the normal high pass, low pass calculator or the narrow band pass filter?
From what I understand from here: http://www.the12volt.com/caraudio/crosscalc.asp#cc I have to use the high and low pass calculator for woofers and tweeters and narrow band pass calculator for mid-low and mid high. I'm correct? |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
|
hi patriz
a passive line level crossover is a filter (or a series of filters) made tipically with low-power resistors (no inductor) and capacitors. It's not a very common solution, because you have loss in the signal due to the attenuation of resistors. the on-line calculator you suggest is for "power" crossover (placed between amplifier and the set of loudspeakers), with a low input an low output impedence. If you use it with a line level inpedence (example 10 k ohm) you'll obtain very large values of inductors and capacitors. ps: i strongly suggest not to use the Narrow Band Pass Filters, that is non-linear in a wide range of frequencies, but a Low Pass Filters followed by an High Pass Filters |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
|
I was concerned about the use of high and low pass because they have to work in a very limited requency range 200-1000hz and 1000-5000hz so I supposed the narrow band pass suited best, but if you say this is true only for "power" xo I'll trust you.
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
|
for your passive line-level xo, some explanations here:
http://www.t-linespeakers.org/tech/f...ssiveHLxo.html read also: http://www.physclips.unsw.edu.au/jw/RCfilters.html http://www.qrp.pops.net/filter1.asp |
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Use "Impedence" or Re for crossover calculator? | critofur | Multi-Way | 9 | 10th April 2008 02:00 PM |
| BSC Calculator | hongrn | Multi-Way | 5 | 10th December 2005 05:06 PM |
| crossover calculator accuracy | pikkujöpö | Multi-Way | 4 | 5th September 2005 12:56 PM |
| here's my new OB calculator :) | hitsware | Full Range | 11 | 12th November 2004 03:42 PM |
| DRD calculator | garbage | Tubes / Valves | 2 | 29th October 2004 02:31 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.09253 seconds (65.48% PHP - 34.52% MySQL) with 10 queries |