|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: alaska
|
Hi,
I'm planning to build the ZD5's soon. I would like to see others progress or completed photos. Searched this forum and others but only found a 3 or 4 completed photos. I haven't decided whether to build the sealed or vented. Is there any reason to build the sealed instead of the vented? I ask this because that Zaph's build was sealed. I did see a post by ZDR that he thought the bass was a little boomy on his vented ZD5's. I would also appreciate any tips, thoughts or suggestions. Thanks,
__________________
cj.9 |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: alaska
|
ZD5 Parts list - Madisound
Not sure if this link works but it's the parts list I've started at Madisound. Most of the list was borrowed from another post. Link seems to work but have to log into google.... If anyone sees any items that should be changed/upgraded, please let me know.
__________________
cj.9 |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: alaska
|
__________________
cj.9 |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Wisconsin
|
Nice list. I didn't even know Google had that sort of online spreadsheet ability.
I think the only thing I'd change would be the damping sheets. That asphalt based stuff smells bad and the solvents in it can occasionally affect the adhesives in speakers. Rather, I'd use 3 layer Sonic Barrier 1-1/4" on the back, top and bottom, and the 1/2" stuff on the side. Of if you do want more damping ability with the absorption, use the 3 layer 3/4" stuff on the sides but be sure to allow adequate airflow behind the woofer. I see you've upgraded the large electrolytics to poly. That's a $80 upgrade that won't affect the sound quality much if at all. The world is full of people who think electrolytics sound bad and at least they will think it was a good use of funds.
__________________
-Zaph|Audio- |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: San Diego, CA
|
Is there anything to be gained by the (claimed?) closer tolerances of poly caps? Should one measure electrolytics to ensure they are acceptably close to claimed values?
__________________
Soft Dome |
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Wisconsin
|
Quote:
__________________
-Zaph|Audio- |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: alaska
|
Thanks for the reply!
Also many thanks for sharing your designs. I updated the list with the damping you suggested. Also switched back to the Electrolytics, wife was happy to see the cost go down for a change. I hope to place the order by the end of this week. I would start the enclosures but I still haven't decided on sealed or vented.
__________________
cj.9 |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: San Diego, CA
|
cj.9 - Do you have a sub, or are you willing to get/build one? Go sealed with sub, vented without.
__________________
Soft Dome |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
|
Hello Zaph
First many thanks for design , second sorry for bad English. I have some questions about ZD5 design Do you expect some major improvements when this design was executed with active XO? /just hypothetical active xo with same properties? Do you heard Dynaudio active monitor bm5a http://www.dynaudioacoustics.com/Default.asp?Id=3680 ? when yes how do you like it agaist zd5? /i know its stupid question but this speaker is my two way reference/ It is possible use zd5 for near field monitoring application /say 70cm/ Thank you very very much for sharing your knowledges ! Tomas |
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
|
Quote:
Chances are high you will get no answer so : a) No. Even with a correct active c/o improvements are not major. b) Is a stupid question c) It is not balanced for near field monitoring. Desk correction is possible. TBH if you have a pair of BM5a's why would you be looking at ZD5's ? Nearfield monitors and farfield HiFi speakers most of the time do not share exactly similar design requirements, but it depends how and what for the nearfields are used. |
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.18001 seconds (56.55% PHP - 43.45% MySQL) with 10 queries |