|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Articles | Links | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
We're saving for a new server - help us to serve you by Donating Today and become a friend with benefits!
Ads on/off / Custom Title / 2009 Tshirt / More PMs / Bigger Images / Advanced printing |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
|
Greetings,
Having been an audio nut for 30+ years, I finally decided to take the plunge, and build my own pair of speakers...They are based on the Great Plains Audio (Altec) 604 coaxial driver, along with a tested cabinet design. I'm using the stock Great Plains crossover, which was evidently modeled for a cabinet of a similar baffle width, but I'm still struggling with the "tuning" of the system. Let me say right off the bat that I'm a complete novice, but I've done quite a bit of research to try and educate myself. I now have more respect than ever for speaker designers! It’s certainly a far cry from putting a driver in a box!! With that said, I still need to be fed information at the kindergartner level. What I am faced with is a system that has what seems to be the typical baffle step issues. Output from the vocals up is extremely forward and overwhelms the rest of the frequency spectrum, to the point of being “shouty.” I have experimented with a baffle step correction circuit, as detailed by the very kind and generous Martin King, but I don’t believe it applies to a two-way driver, as I’m experiencing odd results (vocals become recessed, but the remainder of the spectrum remains elevated).A couple of folks have mentioned that the 604 driver is “high Q,” and designed to be used with an amplifier with high output impedance. The cabinet design evidently was designed around this parameter as well. Sadly, I am in the dark with this. My current solid state amplifier is an obvious mismatch for this system, so I am wondering if moving to a tube amplifier with high output impedance would change the character of the system? If so, how (in laymen’s terms if possible)? Thanks so much!!! Despite my lack of knowledge, I'm having fun, and am determined to make the system right!!! There's magic hidden within this system that I want to break out...
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
|
My apologies....
Evidently, the 604 driver has a LOW Q, not a high Q.... |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: UK
|
Right. Most SS amps have a high output impedance (or low damping factor if you prefer). With a low Q driver, which is essentially over-damped in the bass, you will have a relatively weak LF response, because there's only so much the cabinet can do to boost things, and it's not getting any help from the amplifier. Shifting to a lower output impedance / higher DF amp will bring things back into line. Meantime -you could try sticking a resistor in the hot lead to the driver, which will artificially lower the amp's DF a bit.
In the long term, you might want to change your amplifier -doesn't have to be to tubes -Nelson's First Watt F3, or a couple of his F4s with a high-gain pre-amp spring to mind. ![]() 604s. Oh well, one day, when I'm rich.
__________________
'This nice man has stopped on an old Russian motorcycle and I think he's going to give me some petrol. What a nice man. In fact, I think I'll pay him. Me đồng's gonna be all soggy isn't it?' James May, in a Vietnamese thunderstorm. |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Chamblee, Ga.
|
I believe you mean tube amps and shifting to a higher output impedance/lower DF for low Qts drivers since SS amps typically have an output impedance < 0.1 ohms, ergo are best suited for > 0.5 Q systems........ http://www.audioasylum.com/forums/hu...13/131306.html
GM
__________________
Loud is Beautiful if it's Clean! As always though, the usual disclaimers apply to this post's contents. |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: UK
|
Er, yes.
Ye Gods, I can't believe I wrote that! This is what happens when I'm not concentrating -I shall now go & iron my hands in punishment. Not one of my better days, this. Thanks for picking up on it Greg!
__________________
'This nice man has stopped on an old Russian motorcycle and I think he's going to give me some petrol. What a nice man. In fact, I think I'll pay him. Me đồng's gonna be all soggy isn't it?' James May, in a Vietnamese thunderstorm. |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
|
Thanks everyone.....
Is there a straightfoward way to determine the critical damping factor of the driver (or my system in total) in order to identify the proper amplifier match? Once identified, I would assume that I could calculate the optimum output impedance, correct? Or, am I looking too far into this? Do most tube amplifiers have sufficiently high output impedance to accommodate? Thanks again!
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Clifton Park, NY
|
By using a BSC filter, you have already simulated the impact of the low damping factor that can be achieved with a tube amp. Above a few hundred Hz, you essentially have a DC resistance downstream from your SS amp in series with the driver. This is the effect you would be looking for in a tube amp. However, your DC resistance is adjustable since it is not amp design dependent.
The other property of a tube amp that might be of assistance is a rolled off high frequency response. This might help eleviate a painful top end. At one time I had an old Adcom GFA 555 amp which was a very dark sounding amp. At the time, my Focal inverted metal dome tweeters sounded very nice. When I switched SS amps to a newer vintage the tweeters sounded too bright. In effect, you could tune your speaker further by selecting a tube amp. But which one? I would recommend trying before buying to make sure that the tube amp's high frequency properties compliment the speakers high frequency response. Or, if you want to experiment some more add a low pass filter at some higher frequency to roll off the highs gradually. This would definitely be a trial and error effort and might take some time. I have no idea what starting values to recommend since I have never worked with this driver. Hope that helps.
__________________
Martin Quarter Wavelength Loudspeaker Design www.quarter-wave.com Yahoo Group for my Web Site and MathCad Worksheet Information http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/quarter-wave |
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Phila., PA
|
Of course, it could just be that you are one of the legion that find the Altec 'house' sound aggressive or 'shouty'. It's not as though they don't have that reputation.
Regards, John |
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
|
Thanks again everyone.....
Regarding the BSC filter duplicating the effects of a lower damping factor, what value of resistance would provide an accurate representation of having an amplifier with a higher output impedance? Would 2ohm's of resistance be a fair representation, or would it be much higher, on the order of 10ohm's? I still have the circuit in place, so it would be a simple matter of changing out the resistors. I am also consider a different crossover, likely the Jeff Markwart design, where L-pads can be used to attenuate the higher frequencies. I'd prefer to get the new amplifier in place first to determine its impact on the system. Thanks! |
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Chamblee, Ga.
|
Quote:
GM
__________________
Loud is Beautiful if it's Clean! As always though, the usual disclaimers apply to this post's contents. |
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Possible to design a high-power class D amp with a low output impedance? | 454Casull | Class D | 2 | 23rd February 2009 08:33 PM |
| Low amp Impedance input and high dac output | tulip | Tubes / Valves | 1 | 30th November 2007 09:24 PM |
| High output impedance amplifier power | 454Casull | Solid State | 6 | 13th February 2005 09:25 PM |
| What's the advantage of having a high (+-200R) output impedance? | Bricolo | Digital Source | 9 | 8th February 2004 01:56 AM |
| output stage with high impedance | alex0 | Solid State | 50 | 10th September 2003 08:21 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.28726912 seconds (63.19% PHP - 36.81% MySQL) with 10 queries |