|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Minnesota
|
Hey guys,
I am not quite clear on how one implements a 2.5-way design. Is it absolutely imperative that the two midbass drivers are identical? What if the two drivers in question were from the same manufacturer but they had different motor designs, ie. underhung and overhung motors? Can this be accounted for in the crossover design or would this then mean the speaker would have to be a 3-way or you are SOL? |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
|
Hi,
It is a lot easier if the two drivers are identical. If they are not it is more complicated but still possible. It will be easier for the different drivers to have separate airspaces but if they do share the same airspace it is more complicated, and may not work well. Really depends what you have in mind ...... or the drivers ...... |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Minnesota
|
Thanks sreten.
Here is what I have in mind. Currently, I have a 2-way with a 7" driver. The 7" driver does not play very low in a sealed cabinet. I was thinking that if I added another 7" driver (overhung motor) to the mix if it would allow me to keep the save crossover configuration. Probably be easier to just design a 3-way? |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
|
Hi,
Is the 2 way fully BSC'd ? In that case a subwoofer may be easier. If the 2way is not BSC'd at all then its a candidate for a 2.5 way. One option is adding a vented extra driver, (separate air space obviously), in this case it may not necessarily need a longer excursion driver, only modelling can really tell you this. An example : http://www.humblehomemadehifi.com/Auriga.html Note for the above case the driver is not really suited to sealed box loading (except as a satellite for subwoofers), and in fact the whole arrangement gives no more bass depth than a vented 2 way. What is does do is have 6dB more voltage sensitivity (albeit 4 ohm) and higher maximum bass levels as you have two bass drivers. Shown is a typical current 6.5" unit actually designed for vented loading in a sealed cabinet versus a larger vented cabinet : Note a 3-way with 7" mid is likely best designed with no BSC on the 7", this being filled in by the bass drivers overlapping the mid unit somewhat, see : http://www.deadwaxcafe.com/vzone/david/david.htm For the vented box most of the extra work is done by the port in the low bass region and output is equivalent to 4 sealed drivers. |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Help with schematic understanding | sumo | Tubes / Valves | 6 | 2nd May 2009 11:07 PM |
| Understanding Simple SE design choices | rockgardenlove | Tubes / Valves | 1 | 22nd November 2008 07:28 PM |
| Help understanding this crossover | larryfff | Multi-Way | 5 | 18th February 2008 08:34 PM |
| Amp understanding / help | bear-hifi | Pass Labs | 1 | 7th February 2006 05:56 PM |
| Amp understanding / help | bear-hifi | Solid State | 2 | 7th February 2006 03:26 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.08970 seconds (72.54% PHP - 27.46% MySQL) with 11 queries |