|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2007
|
I have had four of the HiVi A5+(Link) buyouts and two TB W3-871's(Link) laying around for a while. I know the TB is more or less a FR driver, but have come across some using it as a tweeter. Any opinions on these being used in a TM or MTM configuration? If these drivers might perform decent or better together, crossover help would also be greatly appreciated.
TIA, Brian |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: San Diego, CA
|
It would be helpful to see the response graph on the HiVi, to get a better idea of where to put the crossover point. The TB driver could be run fullrange, with maybe some cutoff towards the bottom end to let the HiVis take over down there. But you would probably want to put a higher order lowpass on the HiVis to let them do the bass as much as possible.
I think an MTM is your best bet here - a TMM is possible but that would be a 2.5 way and need a more complex crossover. Keep it simple for now.
__________________
Soft Dome |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: San Diego, CA
|
Well the HiVis are nice and smooth all the way through the midrange but start to get ragged above 1K. I think what you'll want to do here is let the TBs be your mid-high drivers but get them out of the bass region because small drivers like this will just bottom out if you try to drive them fullrange into high SPLs.
The HiVis can serve primarily midbass and bass, but could share the midrange too. If you want them to do most of the bass work then a lower crossover point is better. I'm guessing here that you don't want to spend a lot of money on crossover parts, so you may be able to get away with a first order crossover for each driver, and see what you end up with. It would really be best if you could model these with software though, otherwise we're both guessing. I have some software loaded but I haven't used it yet - maybe this would be a good place to start! If I had to nail down a crossover point I'd want to keep it out of the voice region so maybe 300 Hz is a good spot, but both drivers roll off rather gradually so a second-order XO may be appropriate if you want to really get the most out of these. Save money and use electrolytic capacitors, and go MTM.
__________________
Soft Dome |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
|
Hmmm.........
the A5 and the TB might work as an MT with a first order series crossover and the c/o point set to reflect baffle step, its hard to say without modelling. For parrallel (4ohm) MTM the TB is not sensitive enough and a standard good tweeter is far better idea IMO. I have Zaph's 871 files archived, Timn8ters site has some info. |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: San Diego, CA
|
"For parrallel (4ohm) MTM the TB is not sensitive enough
and a standard good tweeter is far better idea IMO." Well sure but let's try to work with what he's already got.
__________________
Soft Dome |
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: San Diego, CA
|
Quote:
As far as the MTM goes, yeah it may be a bad idea - the TB could get "lost" in the HiVis - but if you want to use both the HiVis in each speaker you'd need to go TMM 2.5-way. Sreten can this be done with just an inductor for the .5 woofer? Or? Also Brian - I'm assuming you do want to do something with these drivers - if that's wrong and you're willing to invest in others, let us know and the advice may take a different path. If not it's no problem - build something and learn, and if you like the sound then you've been successful.
__________________
Soft Dome |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2007
|
Quote:
As far as the possibility of using different drivers, i would still want to use the HiVi mids but would consider a good, dedicated tweeter. Again, I don't want to go crazy on xo components as the drivers cost about $60.00 with buyout and sale pricing. So I don't want to spend more on components than i did on drivers. thanks, Brian |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: San Diego, CA
|
Well what would you say is your remaining budget?
__________________
Soft Dome |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Any opinions on Neo-fone driver? | bluegti | Full Range | 13 | 4th July 2010 02:22 AM |
| Vifa TG9 any one have opinions of this driver | Puggie | Full Range | 2 | 3rd December 2007 08:56 AM |
| Opinions Needed on Final Driver Selection | slhijb | Multi-Way | 17 | 19th June 2007 06:27 PM |
| 3 Different Outputstage Driver Arrangements, Your Opinions! | Ultima Thule | Solid State | 86 | 13th June 2005 07:47 PM |
| Tang Band driver opinions | Jared | Multi-Way | 37 | 12th June 2003 11:19 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.11121 seconds (79.18% PHP - 20.82% MySQL) with 10 queries |