|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Belgium
|
Is it recommended to use two capacitors in parallel in a crossover?
Do you have a smaller resistance when you place two capacitors in parallel instead of using one big capacitor? |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: UK
|
Hi,
It is quite acceptable to parallel caps in any circuit if this provides the required total capacitance needed. Often one cap alone will not provide what it is ideally required. In some cases I have used up to 30 film caps in parallel to achieve quite high values which are usually only available in electrolytic cap packages, but I prefer the sonic results with HQ film caps, usually. I suppose that the overall ESR will be reduced to an extent in a similar manner to when using resistors in parallel, but I have not made any attempts to measure this at any time, as it is not usually significant in cases such as these. Other impedances in the circuits are likely to dominate any small changes here, in my experience. Frequently I have found it beneficial to use smaller value bypass caps when using larger value caps for the bulk of the capacitance needed, and I always carefully match any total capacitance in both stereo x'over circuits. This generally means carefully measuring all caps and for example using say a 4.6uF cap in parallel with a 4.8uF, in one x'over, together with 2 x 4.7uF in the other, so that the total capacitance is the same for both x'overs. I hope that this helps. Regards,
__________________
Bob |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Belgium
|
Bob, thanks for reply,
At this moment I'm experimenting with a notch filter for my woofer to reduce a peak in the frequency response. (830 Hz) And it works. It have found that the notch filter have more effect with two capacitors of 33 uF in parallel instead of one big capacitor of +/- 66uF. So I think I'm going to build this filter with 2 capacitors of 33uF instead of on big capacitor. |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
|
The Q of such a filter can be increased by doing as you have done, and can also be achieved by finding a single higher quality component, not that one is necessarily better than the other.
The filter is usually then honed back using a resistor. If, on the other hand, you need more cut at the resonance frequency, you can try tripling 22uF caps and also using a lower DCR inductor. |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| linking capacitors in parallel - best practice | jscherer | Parts | 8 | 17th March 2009 05:34 AM |
| parallel capacitors in PS question | gary h | Tubes / Valves | 4 | 26th July 2008 09:06 AM |
| advantage to wiring 2 or more capacitors parallel in a simple first order crossover? | ark | Parts | 0 | 16th July 2006 07:33 PM |
| parallel resistors / capacitors in crossover | jimbo1968 | Parts | 4 | 26th January 2006 05:16 PM |
| parallel capacitors | dstockwell | Parts | 1 | 18th November 2005 05:51 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.07880 seconds (70.48% PHP - 29.52% MySQL) with 10 queries |