Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Multi-Way
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 4th January 2008, 07:52 PM   #1
diyAudio Member
 
sdclc126's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: San Diego, CA
Default Filter for Peerless 830896

Greetings!

I am going to be using these 3" widerangers for HT surround as well as serious listening ambience:

http://www.madisound.com/catalog/pro...oducts_id=8305

I am wondering if I should notch the peak in the 10K region - it appears to be fairly significant.

Any thoughts would be greatly appreciated.

And a belated Happy New Year to everybody.
Attached Files
File Type: pdf 830986 fr.pdf (33.9 KB, 29 views)
__________________
Soft Dome
  Reply With Quote
Old 4th January 2008, 08:15 PM   #2
DcibeL is offline DcibeL  Canada
diyAudio Member
 
DcibeL's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Saskatchewan
You're right, it does look fairly significant, and will likely melt your ears .

If I were using this driver, I'd want to cross it to a small tweeter at about 4-5kHz. The Aura NT1 looks like a good candidate for $9.
  Reply With Quote
Old 4th January 2008, 09:54 PM   #3
diyAudio Member
 
sdclc126's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: San Diego, CA
I want to get away with a single driver with minimal filter - I decided to order the Aura NS3-193-8A1 - more expensive and less efficient than the Peerless, but it has a smaller peak lower down that I don't think will need a notch, and the next one is up at 15 which I think for my needs will be pretty much out of the way.
__________________
Soft Dome
  Reply With Quote
Old 9th January 2008, 12:01 AM   #4
DcibeL is offline DcibeL  Canada
diyAudio Member
 
DcibeL's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Saskatchewan
Excellent choice.
  Reply With Quote
Old 9th January 2008, 12:07 AM   #5
diyAudio Member
 
sdclc126's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: San Diego, CA
Thanks -

They arrive Friday!
__________________
Soft Dome
  Reply With Quote
Old 10th January 2008, 04:49 PM   #6
sreten is offline sreten  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
Quote:
Originally posted by sdclc126
I want to get away with a single driver with minimal filter - I decided to order the Aura NS3-193-8A1 - more expensive and less efficient than the Peerless, but it has a smaller peak lower down that I don't think will need a notch, and the next one is up at 15 which I think for my needs will be pretty much out of the way.
Hi, wishful thinking, /sreten.
Attached Images
File Type: gif aurans3-193.gif (19.3 KB, 149 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 11th January 2008, 03:37 AM   #7
diyAudio Member
 
sdclc126's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: San Diego, CA
They look almost identical to me, only at different dB levels. But I'm no expert.

Filter can come later if I feel it's needed.
__________________
Soft Dome
  Reply With Quote
Old 11th January 2008, 03:53 AM   #8
DcibeL is offline DcibeL  Canada
diyAudio Member
 
DcibeL's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Saskatchewan
Looking at the transfer curve you can see exactly what the filter does; it helps flatten the two lumps in the frequency response. The improvement I believe will be fairly significant, though the filter parts could easily end up costing the same amount as the driver itself.
__________________
The power of Science compels you!
  Reply With Quote
Old 11th January 2008, 03:55 AM   #9
diyAudio Member
 
sdclc126's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: San Diego, CA
For HT and ambience I'm not too worried at the moment. If these were going to be mains...
__________________
Soft Dome
  Reply With Quote
Old 11th January 2008, 09:50 AM   #10
sreten is offline sreten  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
Default Re: Filter for Peerless 830896

Quote:
Originally posted by sdclc126
Greetings!

I am going to be using these 3" widerangers for .... serious listening ambience:

I am wondering if I should notch the peak in the 10K region - it appears to be fairly significant.

Hi,

Well you asked the question, and Zaph does not gild the lily.

/sreten.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
peerless xxls sealed -vs- peerless xls with passive radiator Naudio Subwoofers 8 23rd March 2008 09:00 PM
need help wana change 60-Hz twin-T notch filter to 279 Hz filter prorms Solid State 0 9th February 2008 11:38 PM
active filter from rod elliot and sub filter questions wuffer Parts 0 2nd October 2005 01:12 PM
Peerless kit PP33 filter schematic ??? AudioGuy Multi-Way 0 27th January 2004 10:31 PM
Whats the difference between the Peerless 831916 and Peerless 850122 SkinnyBoy Multi-Way 9 12th June 2003 03:11 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 07:59 AM.

Page generated in 0.09573 seconds (78.93% PHP - 21.07% MySQL) with 11 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio