|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: Dec 2007
|
with the following horn as a starting point:
http://www.eaw.com/products/KF940.html step 1: split off the top part (from 2x12" turns to 1x12") step 2: change dimensions from 16"x36"x52" to 28"x28"x72" step 3: change 12" driver to 15" step 4: rotate face down and raise about 1.5 feet above floor on legs. would it work ? the reason i want 28"W x 28"D x 72"H dimensions is because thats roughly the biggest box i would be able to roll through the doors and corridors on a dolly. if i increased the depth to something greater i would run the risk of not being able to turn it around if it had to go through a corridor and then through a door on the side. with a square footprint i will not need to turn it, it would just go sideways without turning. also considering the doors are 80" high i want to leave some room for the dolly to go under the box. however the legs would be in addition to the 72" height, so assembled it would be about 90" tall. also i would like to build a pair and not place them in corners but only against the wall close to the speakers for improved integration with speakers and better stereo imaging. i would like them to operate down to about 18hz using something like 15" TC Sounds LMS woofer ... i should be able to pack about 15 feet of horn into this thing (folded twice) so i should be able to get 1/4 wave down to 20hz but the mouth would only be 28" square ... do you see any obvious problem with such a design ? |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
|
Horns are meant to operate into the room, so pointing them down may at first seem like a bad idea, but here's a suggestion.
If you put it against a wall and point it down, raise it so there's as much area around the base (or a little more) than the mouth. i.e. (width + (2 x depth)) x (height off the ground) = mouth area |
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: Dec 2007
|
Quote:
also i could put a little "pyramid" on the floor under the mouth to act as a soft of a phase plug / diffuser. the point is to make a large horn have a small footprint and be easily transportable. ? |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
|
I like the sound of this huge sub on wheels. I'll watch this thread closely.
Have you considered Tapped horns? Look in the Subwoofer thread. Tricky design but huge efficiency. |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Portal 2012
|
With that woofer you will have to use a non conventional horn. It is not suited for a normal horn. Used the Danley 'Tapped Horn" - email him for ideas, he posts here as Tom Danley. There is a thread in subwoofers here. The tapped horn lowers the excursion at low frequencies (mostly) that lowers distortion. I don't think there will be a huge gain in efficiency with that driver.
http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/showt...90#post1389490 |
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Front firing vs down firing sub? | alex_g | Subwoofers | 32 | 22nd June 2010 12:34 PM |
| Down firing vs side firing? | Tee-Bruce | Subwoofers | 36 | 26th August 2009 06:32 AM |
| Woofer: side firing pair vs front firing? | tcpip | Multi-Way | 13 | 9th September 2005 02:13 PM |
| Up Firing | Fazorcat | Subwoofers | 15 | 11th March 2005 01:40 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.09504 seconds (76.69% PHP - 23.31% MySQL) with 10 queries |