|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#21 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
|
OK fair enough. Part of the question was regarding stuffing materials. I have read for years that wool was a very good material for stuffing, some people used fiberglass. I remember most of the speakers I took apart when I was a kid had fiberclass glued to the inner box walls. The first set of speakers I built about 16 years ago I used fiberglass on the walls only. More recenty there seems to be more people talking about polyfill or pillow stuffing materials and stuffing the cabinet relatively full. I was kind of considering using both. Any thoughts?
|
|
|
|
#22 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Stockholm
|
Quote:
If it is box resonances you want to kill, polyfill is not a good idea. If it is only isothermalizing you want (eg for a sub) it might be a very good idea. A sub typically has a crossover filter that removes the frequencies where there are box resonances. |
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
|
Well I am trying out 100% wool blanket material wrapped in poly to stuff the balance of the cabinets. I previously had them about half stuffed. We'll see what effect this has.
|
|
|
|
#24 | |
|
Account disabled at member's request
Join Date: Mar 2007
|
Quote:
Hi, Did you design the box correctly? Is the port tube length and diameter correct? How about the crossover? These have a bigger effect on the sound quality than stuffing. |
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
|
You know I wish I could emphatically say yes, but not knowing the T/S specs on the woofers makes it less then certain that I calculated the box volumes correctly. The x-overs I got from the same person I got the drivers from. They are a Wilson Cub emulation. Like I said they sound good, just not the wow factor I was expecting. They sound better for HT then for stereo which is a disapointment.
|
|
|
|
#26 | |
|
Account disabled at member's request
Join Date: Mar 2007
|
Quote:
I take it they sound boomy? Box tuning might be lower than it should be. Do this: Block the port with a pair of socks or something and see if that improves the way they sound. |
|
|
|
|
#27 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
|
10 years ago, I've read an article form Car Stereo Review magazine.
It was an experiment about the effect of poly fill on the box volume of a sub box, AFAICR, It was a 1 cu/ft box. There were 25 to 40% gain in volume of the box, depending on how much poly fill was filled. AFAICR again, with 1 pound polyfill on a 1 cu/ft of box, the gain is about 25% increase in volume. You can increase the polyfill up to 1.75 pounds per 1 cu/ft of box, But increasing it beyond 1.75 pounds per 1 cu/ft would have the effect of decreasing the box volume due to over stuffing. For the larger box on the experiment, I think it was about 3cu/ft, the Gain in volume was less, only up to about 35% max. All in all, from what I',ve learned from that article , is that 1 pound of polyfill per 1 cu/ft , is a good starting point. |
|
|
|
#28 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
|
Quote:
Boomy........maybe a little. I would call it more muddy than boomy. They don't sound clear and natural in stereo, that is why I was thinking box resonance. You may be right about the box tuning because I went by the information given to me by the person who sold me the drivers. I built my center channel out of the same drivers and x-overs, but built a sealed enclosure, obviously to make it smaller and better for voices, and it does sounds better. If he was off, my box tuning would definately be off as well since I used a program to give me box volume and port area. That is why I was asking if anyone had any info on those Zetag Hi G1 drivers. I think they are good quality thats why I'm disapointed in the result. I'not 100% sold on the Focals either, but thats for a different thread. Thanks for your input, it is starting to make more sense to me now. |
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
|
OK tomorrow I do some experimentation!
|
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Speaker Damping Material | Retrosonic | Full Range | 14 | 7th February 2009 07:36 PM |
| Damping speaker frames | jamikl | Multi-Way | 37 | 14th June 2007 03:03 AM |
| speaker without damping materials | Kal | Multi-Way | 4 | 30th June 2004 10:23 AM |
| Speaker Damping Material | AudioFreak | Multi-Way | 12 | 7th January 2003 08:29 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |