|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
|
Hi,
I would like to ask your opinions regarding this idea. It probably accomplishes the push pull effect with out inverting physically the woofer. Right now , I am applying it to an open back arrays.I have place a tube limiter(12ax7) before the power amp that limits the negative going cycle. I do this because of the asymmetric shape of the cone of the speaker aside from the asymmetric magnetic forces. From side view perspective, the cone is spearlike in the negative going signal but on the positive going signal, it has a higher drag owing to the parachute effect of the cone. I have attached the negative limiter I am using. The effect reduces some distortions which the DCX is not capable of removing and the difference significant particularly with the open back arrays.Without it, I cannot listen to the arrays. I have applied it to the array midbass (open back) and the array woofers(open back). TIA http://picasaweb.google.com/bernardo...OpenBackArrays Lito |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: KyOhWVa tristate
|
So what you're saying is that the rarefaction drag on the "parachute" side, as you put it, is lower than the compression stroke, and vice versa? And that this effect is remedied by "cancelling" the negative half of the waveform, essentially rectifying the signal? If you have a planar driver, this shouldn't be a problem, no? Maybe you could show that with your setup.
have you made any measurements that show any of this to be true, or is this improvement based on hearing only? John L.
__________________
"...His brain is squirming like a toad..." Jim Morrison |
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Tampa
|
Quote:
cheers, AJ |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
|
I tried measuring 2nd order distortion of my open back array using a tube limiter which reduces the negative going signal and Speaker Workshop to measure it and these are the result. Frequency at 1 power.When there is no limiting, this the value I get from the graph 2nd harmonic distortion at 200 HZ. My stimulus is 100 HZ sine. As I increase the limiting of the signal, it goes down to 1.4db , 1.22, 1.011, .537 , .357 . I am new to this software and it is quite difficult to use. Apparently any limiting to the negative going signal reduces 2nd order distortion ? What do you think? TIA
Lito http://picasaweb.google.com/bernardo...OpenBackArrays |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
|
Hmmm.......
Tests at one frequency do not mean a lot. A tube limiter set to cancel 2nd harmonic at 100Hz at a particular level will significantly increase 2nd harmonic distortion above this frequency and at other power levels. |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
|
Checked 3rd & 4th harmonic distortion and there was an apparent reduction too.. 678 to .65 and .8 to .7 .I changed to the stimulus to 200 hz and again , as I trimmed the negative cycle, the 2nd harmonic decreased from 1.559, 1.28 , .99 , .42
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Asymmetric construction induced distortion in electrostatic speakers | arend-jan | Planars & Exotics | 29 | 17th July 2009 03:22 PM |
| cathode follower asymmetric slew | rdf | Tubes / Valves | 4 | 1st November 2007 03:11 AM |
| Decent chip amp with asymmetric supply (similar to low-fi LM386)? | mr_push_pull | Chip Amps | 7 | 21st June 2007 12:47 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.09499 seconds (76.95% PHP - 23.05% MySQL) with 10 queries |