|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
|
I was wondering "again"
Is there a curtian "formula" for determining the correct enclouser size that is used for testing for the Vas of the driver. You know how they say if you are testing an eight inch driver use "this" cubic in size test box, etc., etc. I have also heard that the test box should be large enough to raise the resonant frequency of the driver at least ten percent or so when put in the test box vs. free air. Is there a formula to use so one could find the correct test box volume for a given driver based off of the free air resonance. I am trying to find the correct test box internal volume for the Peerless four inch woofer that I intend to be using for midrange duties.Anyone know of an easy formula for this??? |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: USA, MN
|
A formula that would work as well as any other would be to square the diameter in inches and divide by ~ 100 to 150. This would give the test box volume in cubic feet.
This gives (roughly): 12" ----- ~1 - 1.5 cubic foot 10" ----- ~.7 - 1 8" ------- ~ 0.5 6" ------- ~ .25-.35 5" ------- ~ .15-.25 4" ------- ~ .1-.15
__________________
Our species needs, and deserves, a citizenry with minds wide awake and a basic understanding of how the world works. --Carl Sagan Science is a way of thinking much more than it is a body of knowledge. --Carl Sagan |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
|
Great!, that is what I was looking for.
Thanks, dallaire |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
|
Hi Dallaire,
can I suggest that your mid range may sound better overall if you do not box load it. You have a choice of open baffle, open ended short tube, horn, transmission line, sealed box, vented box. I suspect they are listed in my order of preference. Each of these could be tuned with various amounts of long haired wool for damping.
__________________
regards Andrew T. |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
|
Yes Andrew, I think I'm going to experiment a little with this. Tonight I made a "mock" up baffle and mounted one mid in design position and affixed capped tube enclouser to back of baffle so mid "is" in enclouser. I will listen and measure this, then remove cap at end and test and listen again. You are the second person to suggest this, so I am looking forward to hearing and measuring tomm. I can't say I have ever seen a open back mid in any boutique or consumer electrinics outlet. I guess it would be hard to sell to most people with a hole in the back of a speaker
But to "me" sound good I'll build it that way!!! I'll let you know how it goes, thanks for the info, it's allways nice to get other opinions on the subject!Regards, dallaire |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Speaker Parameters - L1 and R1 ??? | BlueWizard | Multi-Way | 3 | 1st August 2008 05:54 PM |
| speaker parameters | pjaneiro | Multi-Way | 1 | 10th January 2007 05:51 PM |
| Testing Thiel Small parameters. | AndrewT | Multi-Way | 2 | 13th May 2005 06:05 PM |
| Speaker Parameters Measurement | metal | Multi-Way | 1 | 3rd July 2004 07:43 PM |
| Help in Testing TS Parameters | r_s_dhar | Multi-Way | 1 | 13th June 2002 12:54 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.08615 seconds (72.70% PHP - 27.30% MySQL) with 10 queries |