|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: San Diego, CA
|
Hi,
Does dipole bass need to face forward into the listening room in order to work, or does it not matter at the lower frequencies? I'm purely concerned with aesthetics here actually, by making the woofers less visible from the front. I was thinking of taking an H-frame and turning it 90 degrees to the side so a finished panel would face forward, and then placing the mid/tweeter panel in the normal location above that. For saving vertical space, could the H-frame be placed horizontally also? Perhaps a taller, line array type mid/tweet main panel could then go above the lower H-frame. One more - picture a "tower" H-frame, with four+ woofers - turned sideways, could the now front-facing panel serve as a baffle for mid/tweet? I'm thinking the only way it could work is if the front panel is widened with "wings," extending out beyond the width of the H-frame. But then would the H-frame interfere with the dipole response of the mids? Thanks.
__________________
Soft Dome |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Anonymityville
|
By turning the dipole sideways you are effectively in it's null where the front and back waves cancel each other.
__________________
"If you don't like funerals don't kick sand in Ninja's face." - Ninja |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: San Diego, CA
|
I wasn't sure if this would apply to bass, it being less directional. I suppose there would still be a null though.
__________________
Soft Dome |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Sydney
|
you can do that with a ripole
http://www.lautsprechershop.de/hifi/...i/ripol_en.htm |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: San Diego, CA
|
Yes I forgot about that - like the Linkwitz dipole woofer for the Phoenix. Can't do what I had in mind with an H-frame but can with dipole w/ woofers stacked and facing same direction.
I like that anyway - it saves a lot of space.
__________________
Soft Dome |
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Taiwan
|
Quote:
Even in indoor, the dipole bass is very directional. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bucharest
|
Quote:
This applies especially to bass. Its upwards in frequency where the dipole stops being a dipole(usually above a few hundred Hz). You can use a variation of Ripole/W-baffle (I guess even a "half ripole" would do the job - I mean, only one driver mounted on the side of an U-Baffle)
__________________
I don't believe in audio believings. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: San Diego, CA
|
Yes - I think one of the main design goals of dipole base is to BE directional, in order to mitigate room gain.
__________________
Soft Dome |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
you're still on the null axis. and a reflected null is still a null.
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Dipole bass or Ripole Bass? | MJL21193 | Subwoofers | 13 | 15th September 2008 07:42 AM |
| Active filter for bass dipole | felixx | Multi-Way | 1 | 7th December 2006 12:05 PM |
| dipole stereo bass? | xstephanx | Subwoofers | 63 | 1st June 2006 12:19 PM |
| Some dipole bass measurements | John Sheerin | Multi-Way | 19 | 3rd January 2005 06:48 AM |
| dipole bass help | amo | Multi-Way | 11 | 17th September 2003 06:06 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.10113 seconds (79.51% PHP - 20.49% MySQL) with 10 queries |