Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Multi-Way

Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 25th November 2007, 01:00 AM   #1
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Toronto, ON, Canada
Default Realism and room reflections

Does a rear-wall reflection enhance the sense of realism provided by stereo speakers?

If not, does that mean in-wall speakers are generally better than discrete speakers, all else equal?
  Reply With Quote
Old 25th November 2007, 10:36 AM   #2
MaVo is offline MaVo  Germany
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Herne
If you define realism as the most accurate recreation of the records audio information, then a rear wall reflection obviously degrades the realism, since it adds information which is not in the record.
  Reply With Quote
Old 25th November 2007, 10:37 AM   #3
serby is offline serby  Romania
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Send a message via Yahoo to serby
Up to one point is is good to have some acoustically absorbent materials on the real wall in the secondary reflexion point - this will help improve the overall sound stage and focusing of your system. A room that has to many absorbents in it will sound "dead" - to dull and different from a live performance , a room with no absorbents will make to sound to mash - and the sound quality will be affected. So basically you have to find the golden middle way between these two extremes - by trial and eror - and find the sound that you like
  Reply With Quote
Old 25th November 2007, 11:47 AM   #4
BHTX is offline BHTX  United States
diyAudio Member
 
BHTX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Default Re: Realism and room reflections

Quote:
Originally posted by 454Casull
Does a rear-wall reflection enhance the sense of realism provided by stereo speakers?
Well, from my small bit of personal experience (in comparison to others around here), I've come to the conclusion that there's not really a definite answer to this rather subjective question, mainly due to personal preference, different rooms, different speakers, etc etc. BUT, when thinking back on all of the systems I've had/heard.. for me, the answer is usually No. HOWEVER, that is NOT to say that dipoles don't usually tend to provide a clearly audible positive impact on the sense of depth and realism when properly implemented.. which of course, is just another matter of opinion and personal preference in itself. Personally, a large majority of my listening has been dipoles, and I've always experimented with a combination of aborbing+diffusing the rear wave as necessary, then I leave it alone when I think it sounds right.

Quote:
Originally posted by 454Casull
If not, does that mean in-wall speakers are generally better than discrete speakers, all else equal?
I believe this approach often creates another whole set of obsticles to overcome, not to mention how most people would probably agree that it'd suck badly if their speakers were designed only to be placed statically within a wall. No options for placement within the room? Forced with an infinite baffle?? Yuck. I think this just makes things much more complicated than they already are, and for no real reason at all. Basically, "all else" CAN'T be "equal", and needs to be designed/dealt with accordingly. Go take a pair of thin monopoles and place them against the wall and listen to them, even going as far as covering the rest or the majority of that wall with thick damping material so that it sits flush with the sides of the loudspeaker enclosures... then come back and tell me what you think. I'll bet you won't like it. Aside from the obvious effects of having a conventional monopole loudspeaker too close/against a wall, I certainly didn't like it one bit. As expected, the soundstage collapsed, as did the entire listening experience.
  Reply With Quote
Old 26th November 2007, 06:20 PM   #5
diyAudio Member
 
myhrrhleine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Avalon Island
rear reflections degrade the sound,
so does any other early reflection.
in wall can improve the sound if the speakers are designed well.

See: http://www.aes.org/e-lib/browse.cfm?elib=2852
__________________
Just because you can't hear it doesn't mean no one can.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Early diffractions / reflections and EQ HiFiNutNut Multi-Way 27 30th April 2009 09:17 PM
Reflections off glass and hard surfaces in - Hz otto88 Multi-Way 24 28th December 2008 10:36 PM
bracing of large cabinets and effects on internal reflections JRKO Multi-Way 7 12th April 2005 07:12 PM
Some reflections on politeness vs. briefness Christer Everything Else 6 24th June 2003 04:36 AM
LM3875 Poweramp- reflections on components... halojoy Parts 101 15th February 2003 12:44 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 03:01 PM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright ©1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2