Parallel inductors (dumb question) w/ Zobel followup - diyAudio
 Parallel inductors (dumb question) w/ Zobel followup
 User Name Stay logged in? Password
 Home Forums Rules Articles diyAudio Store Gallery Wiki Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Search

 Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers

 Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you. Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
 Thread Tools Search this Thread
 16th November 2007, 08:31 PM #1 diyAudio Member   Join Date: May 2007 Parallel inductors (dumb question) w/ Zobel followup Maybe this is because it's friday at 4:30 and my brain is fried, but I have a parallel inductor question. I'm familiar with the L=L1*L2/(L1+L2) math for parallel inductors and resistors. My question is is the DCR in this arrangement the same? DCR=R1*R2/(R1+R2)? The reason I ask is for Zobel network calculations. I have drivers in parallel with 1mH inductance and 6.4Ohm DCR. Should I use separate Zobels for each driver, or one at the end of the crossover, calculated for the drivers in parallel? I think it's simple and the answer is: design a zobel for 0.5 mH and 3.2 Ohms, but my brain keeps second-guessing. Thanks in advance, and I did search, but didn't come up with anything on this topic.
 16th November 2007, 11:47 PM #2 diyAudio Member   Join Date: Nov 2005 If I understand, you simply have the two drivers in parallel. Two woofers or mids? In that case one Zobel; but a larger problem I have is why an LR Zobel? A Zobel is a series RC across the driver terminals, to prevent a rise in high frequency impedance caused by the drivers' inductance. A conjugate is an LRC network, designed to maintain a relatively flat impedance through the LF resonance region. I just awoke from a nap... am I muzzy-headed still? There are a lot of sources for this sort of information, I tend to be partial to the Vance Dickason Cookbook.
 17th November 2007, 12:41 AM #3 diyAudio Member   Join Date: May 2007 No the LR is the woofer, modeled as an inductor and a resistance (as they are usually put into the calculators). I was planning on a traditional R-C parallel circuit (R and C in series, parallel to the woofer pair).
 17th November 2007, 04:50 AM #4 diyAudio Member   Join Date: Dec 2006 There isn't any compelling reason to use more than one RC (at least in my opinion). You are correct about halving the driver impedance for two in parallel. Just calculate the RC for a single driver and halve the resistance and inductance.
diyAudio Member

Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Stockholm
Quote:
 Originally posted by jnb There isn't any compelling reason to use more than one RC (at least in my opinion). You are correct about halving the driver impedance for two in parallel. Just calculate the RC for a single driver and halve the resistance and inductance.
...you mean halve the resistance and double the capacitance ?
__________________
Simulate loudspeakers: Basta!
Simulate the baffle step: The Edge

 17th November 2007, 09:39 AM #6 diyAudio Member   Join Date: Dec 2006 Yes, thank you Svante. Guess I'm having one of those days
 17th November 2007, 11:41 AM #7 diyAudio Member   Join Date: May 2007 Got it. Thanks all. I knew I was overthinking it.
diyAudio Member

Join Date: Nov 2005
Quote:
 Originally posted by jnb Yes, thank you Svante. Guess I'm having one of those days

Thanks, I feel better now .

 19th November 2007, 01:00 PM #9 diyAudio Member   Join Date: May 2007 Okay, I did the calculations and the capacitor it wants to use, is, well, huge! What do you all use for your Zobels? 'lytics? Or do you enjoy spending \$30 on a capacitor that isn't in the signal path ? I built the crossover without the Zobels (woof and mid) and so far it sounds great. I know I still need it, though, due to some nasty breakups that occur about 3 octaves above the woofer X frequency and then a really loud ring in the upper octaves. I'm hoping the zobel will help the normal crossover damp those out without needing a special notch filter or higher slope. Thanks again for the help, all! I'll be posting measurements and pics this week of the prototype.
 19th November 2007, 02:33 PM #10 diyAudio Member     Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: KyOhWVa tristate Big caps When I was building my main dipoles, I listened to just the woofer section (d/c the mid/tweeter part of the xover) to determine what effect the zobel had... then subbed different values until the "voicing" was correct; the calculated value was pretty close. You might consider motor start caps for this, larger values are pretty cheap compared to poly's/ other types... I've heard no ill effects, but, as always... ymmv. What value of cap did you come up with... what frequency does the impedance of the woofers double? John L. __________________ "I've forgotten more than I care to remember" The Last Conspirators

 Thread Tools Search this Thread Search this Thread: Advanced Search

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are Off Pingbacks are Off Refbacks are Off Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post QED047 Class D 6 11th August 2009 03:10 PM monarodan Pass Labs 22 2nd January 2007 02:19 AM Cloth Ears Multi-Way 6 13th January 2006 05:59 AM Mos Fetish Multi-Way 4 3rd February 2004 10:43 AM jwb Solid State 6 20th October 2002 07:56 PM

 New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 02:06 PM.

 Home - Contact Us - Advertise - Rules - diyAudio Store - Sponsors - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Top - Opt-out policy

vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2017 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright ©1999-2017 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2
Wiki