Foam vs Rubber surround - Page 2 - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Multi-Way

Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12th November 2001, 09:43 PM   #11
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Sydney, Australia
Tomcat;

I agree that you have to careful about changing surround materials on drivers, I also know that heat and humidity of the tropics will end the life of foams surrounds very prematurely. So in those climates I give a definite edge to rubber surrounds.

Bawang;

There are different qulities of foam surrounds, so be sure that you get the best that you can find if you are going to use foam in the tropics. I would recommend having a professional replace the surround with rubber and they will be able to provide you with the new parameters to determine if the changes are enough to warrant changes to your boxes.

In my experience, rubber can be used to replace foam if it is done by profeesional(meaning someone who done at least 100 pairs of drivers and aligns and tests the driver after the swap).

Peter of Speakerworks comes highly recommended and his information is in a previous post to this thread.

Surf, Sun & Sound
  Reply With Quote
Old 13th November 2001, 12:53 AM   #12
bawang is offline bawang  Malaysia
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Malaysia
Thanks Surf, Sun & Sound. Will give Speakerworks a try once I found a good way to send those drivers to Australia and back (from Malaysia) without breaking my bank, the drivers and causing the postman to give me a bloody strange look.
  Reply With Quote
Old 13th November 2001, 03:41 AM   #13
walker is offline walker  Australia
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Perth West Australia
Send a message via ICQ to walker
I have had it suggested to me that rubber surrounds age as badly as foam. I guess it depends on the type of rubber used.
I have stocks of speakers over 10yrs old and a quick check found SOME of those with rubber surrounds in poor condition (even though they have never been installed). In fact the foam surround drivers on stock, (also years old) seem to be in better condition generally, at a loss to explain why.
So there you go, the cat is amongst the pidgeons!
I have noted that the better brands seem to have aged less, no suprise.
I now suspect that many speakers with rubber surrounds have aged, (gone soft or hard) but because owners don't see them disintergrate they believe that they are still in good condition.
Your thoughts gentlepersons?
Regards WALKER
  Reply With Quote
Old 13th November 2001, 06:13 AM   #14
pkgum is offline pkgum  Australia
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: sydney
Default treated foam surrounds

rubber does NOT age as badly as foam. rubber is nearly always more durable than untreated foam. The rubber surrounds in the speakers u stock are probably really poorly made if they age faster than foam.
can rubber go soft or hard when it ages?? I didn't know that.... I have a pair of speakers that are 25+ years old and their rubber surrounds on their 10" drivers are as flexible and durable as it was new. BTW i don't believe properly made rubber can disintegrate in only around 10 years. Very very rarely can untreated foam be more durable than rubber.
.................................................. .......
read the desription of these series of drivers
http://www.blueprintdrivers.com/03.html

It has treated foam surrounds. Whats the difference between treated foam surrounds and normal foam surrounds?lasts longer? Will the treated foam surrounds last well in the tropics?

[Edited by pkgum on 11-13-2001 at 01:37 AM]
  Reply With Quote
Old 13th November 2001, 08:07 AM   #15
walker is offline walker  Australia
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Perth West Australia
Send a message via ICQ to walker
The aged rubber surrounds that I have are on SOME CHEAP drivers that I use went customers want a cheap repairs on no-name noisemakers, (read speakers). A couple of rubber surrounds have gone soft and tacky and one is noticeably stiffer than it was when new.
All the foam surround drivers were packaged in a plastic bag with a small satchet of silica gel the rubber driver are not. Mabe the comparison was unfair.

I have replaced the foam surrounds on some of MY own drivers with rubber ones and hope that they will outlast the original surrounds, only time will tell.
At the moment I believe that most quality brand rubber surrounds will outlast foam surrounds. I do know that the type of rubber used varies between manufactures and on cheap drivers it can age.
I have also heard of foam surrounds treated to resist rotting/aging.
Hoping this sets the record straight, the previous posting may have been missleading.
Regards WALKER
  Reply With Quote
Old 13th November 2001, 12:47 PM   #16
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Sydney, Australia
Default For Whatever it is worth!

walker and pkgum,

I believe that we all are on the same wavelength here about the different surround materials used. I am a industrial and furniture designer by trade, so I can tell you from experience(not necessarily on speakers though) that there are many factors that can shorten the life span of a product.

Yes, I have a pair of drivers with rubber surrounds that have gone brittle and are starting to crack, although they are probably 20 years old. My experience with rubber versus foam is that rubber will deteoriate gradually where as foam will have a sudden death. Similar to the steel versus aluminum argument, steel is will flex more under load, is heavier, and as it fatigues will sag or relax over time and the point of failure will be detected by these traits, where as aluminum is more rigid and will flex much less under load over time, but will fail suddenly with very little warning but with catastrophic consequences depending on the application. I know this from designing mountain bike frames and there was much argument about which material was the best for many years in this application.

OK, now that I have bored you to death with some totally unrelated information, here is my conclusion based on my own experiences, rubber will outlast foam of equal quality(high quality foam will outlast cheap rubber and vice versa) under the same enviromental influences, but throw in extremes of humidity, heat, cold, overexposure to sunlight even through a window and you will dramatically shorten the life of either product. I believe that the worst enemy to any material, even we humans, is UV radiation which can reflect off of most any surface and penetrate a large majority of fabrics and materials.

You may be committed to replacing your surrounds with original material to maintain the correct parameters. That is why I recommend have a professional replace the surround since they will the experience to predict the end result and advise you the correct replacement.

Cheers,

Surf, Sun & Sound

  Reply With Quote
Old 13th November 2001, 06:02 PM   #17
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Sth. Oz
I don't want to buy into any argument vis-a-vis which material used for surrounds is the most durable...
All I am saying is that it is a given that changing the surround from foam to rubber will alter the drivers characteristics. Full stop!
On the subject of rubber surrounds, about 7 years ago I had to have a pair of Kef B110's reconed as the rubber surrounds began to crack along the top of the roll. This was very subtle and was only visible on close inspection manually moving the cone backwards and forwards, yet in every other respect it was almost undectable.
tomcat
  Reply With Quote
Old 14th November 2001, 12:02 AM   #18
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Sydney, Australia
Default Mother Nature Never Gives Anyone a Free Lunch

Tomcat,

You are exactly correct, changing surround materials will change driver parameters. Full Stop!! Agreed!!!

The subject of durability arose since there are a few of us who live in climates that are not very friendly toward speaker surrounds of any type.

You can never cheat Mother Nature, foam does make a better surround material, but is more sensitive to enviromental conditions and not as durable as rubber. But eventually both will wear out. Even changing or replacing the surround with the same material in my experience will change driver parameters to some extent. That is why there is a break in period for new drivers. There are very few of us that go to the extra effort of breaking a set of drivers and then taking the parameters needed to design a pair of speakers. Definitely no commercial production concern has the time or the economics to do that.

So unless you break in all your drivers before designing, even the most meticulously designed and built speaker will changeover time, some more and some less depending driver quality.

Mother Nature never gives us anything for free, so we end up choosing the best compromises.

So Tomcat is exactly correct about driver parameters changing, and the best way have least amount of change is to have a skilled and trusted professional do the job.

Surf, Sun & Sound

Regardless, music is the most important thing.
  Reply With Quote
Old 15th November 2001, 02:24 AM   #19
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Columbia, SC
Although I've seen it claimed many times, not once have I ever seen any bona fide evidence that foam surrounds are, in fact, superior in any way (other than being cheaper) to rubber surrounds. Every time I've heard it said, it was always by someone who had a financial stake in the claim that foam was 'just as good' or 'better.' Either they were trying to sell you their product, or they were trying to rationalize having bought such a product in order to save a buck.
It reminds me of the way that people who sell or purchase mobile homes (nowadays we're suppoed to call it manufatured housing) always want to insist that they're 'just as good' as homes built on site. Right. Sure thing. If, for financial reasons, you're forced into buying a mobile home in order to have a roof over your head, at least be honest about it.
There certainly isn't any audible justification for the claimed superiority of foam surrounds. There's no trend towards their use in high-end speakers--can't think of a single one offhand--only cheap to mid-fi speakers. No one I know has ever said that they really like the sound of foam surrounds. I tolerate replacing tubes because they do some things audibly better. I do not tolerate foam surround failures because there's no audible benefit to balance the scales; there's no earthly reason to saddle yourself with a reliability problem that you can easily avoid for a few extra dollars.
The only failures I've seen in good quality neoprene surrounds are when they've been continuously exposed to sunshine or fluorescent lighting (UV is hard on any synthetic), but even then foam surrounds deteriorate far more quickly.
I have quite a few drivers that date from as far back as the '70s. Every one of the rubber surrounds are intact. Not one of the foam surrounds survived. Promises that 'we've got a new formulation that's good forever' have always proved to be lies in the past. I no longer listen to such noise, although I'm sure at some point they will finally get it right. One of the things that I find rather bothersome about manufacturers who build drivers with foam surrounds is that they have this rather predictable habit of being out of business when it's time for the inevitable reconing. Then you're left with the option of putting in a generic surround with different characteristics (thus changing the driver unpredictably) or throwing the remains of the driver into the junk box. That never seemed like a good option to me. I try to build stuff to last--not as an exercise in planned obsolescence.
In short, it ain't worth it. You may save a dollar or two now, but it comes back to haunt you later. Buy quality. It pays.

Grey
  Reply With Quote
Old 4th December 2001, 07:22 PM   #20
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Sth. Oz
Uh-Oh!
So according to your view, Tannoy, Dynaudio, Morel, Audax, JBL and possibly a few others I can't think of at the moment who have used/or still use foam surrounds on some of their models aren't to be considered 'High End'any more?
Hmmmmm!

tomcat
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Foam or rubber, environment independent? buggsson Car Audio 3 10th December 2008 12:06 AM
Making diy foam/rubber surrounds Conrad Hoffman Multi-Way 11 2nd October 2007 12:32 AM
punctured rubber surround alvinlim Multi-Way 9 3rd April 2006 04:37 AM
replacing rubber surrounds with foam Zymrgy Multi-Way 2 6th January 2004 09:33 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 02:49 AM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2