|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Tuusula, Finland
|
I own a pair of quite old pair of Martin Logan Aerius speakers. Seems that woofers have come to their end and needs to be replaced. Insted of ordering new pair of original woofers I would like to try replace them with aftermarket ones. Problem is that I donīt know TS parametres of original woofer. All I know are facts that it is 8" woofer in 23 litres sealed enclosure, with 89db/m sensitivity and has s 12db/oct crossover in 500Hz. What woofer you would recommed? Speaker is bi-wire able so I can use a separate crossover for woofer.
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
|
Hi,
fortunately you do have some descent info on the speakers, see : http://www.stereophile.com/floorloudspeakers/312/ The bass unit is used in its pistonic region so no special EQ. It seems a standard 8 ohm 5.6R or so Re driver. Changing the crossover would seem to be pointless. Due to baffle step effects you do need a 89dB or so driver for 85dB midband, this implies 4dB of baffle step compensation. (can be seen in the nearfield frequency response plots, but this may not be true due to floor coupling of the driver.) For a 23 litre sealed cabinet your choice is basically the Q and Fb - box resonant frequency, the difficulty is finding an 8" driver suited to sealed box loading rather than reflexing - now difficult. TBH you should use the original replacement drivers, and then there would be no need to second guess the driver parameters. Ideally the nominal sensitivity of the driver needs confirming - as described above this is difficult to judge without details of the measuring conditions. Have you considered the Aerius i bass drivers ? |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: NorCal
|
Not the solution you're looking for, but...
I'd love to get a hold of a pair of Aerius electrostat panels, and replace the box woofer with a dipole woofer. The stock crossover would have to be re-engineered, probably easiest to biamp. That removes any worries about efficiency matching, too. What woofer to use? Beats me. If I had the 'stat panels, I'd try the 15" Hawthorne Silver Iris drivers I already own. BTW, the inspiration for that setup is Finnish - the Gradient dipole woofers for the Quad electrostats. I once knew a guy with that setup, and it was very nice indeed. Bill
__________________
The difference between theory and practice is that in theory there is no difference between theory and practice, but in practice there is. |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Tuusula, Finland
|
Thanks for opinons guys!
Yes I have consired to use Model i woofer, and I made a inquiry to ML`s service / Jim Power wich I havenīt got a reply yet. Original Aerius woofers are available and costs about 180 each here in Finland. I guess it would be easiest solution for it. But with that money one could get some up to date woofers also. One I was thinking about is this Scanspeakīs model. http://www.tymphany.com/datasheet/printview.php?id=95 Itīs sbout 200 each. What you think about it? The idea to use dipole woofers with bi amping and active crossover units is intresting. I have to think about it. First I have to get Logans back from service. Other speaker has a problem with charging the esl panel. Or I hope it is only that. New panels cost ONLY 750 EACH! Oh my god... |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
|
Hi,
The current woofers need new surrounds ? can be done. If bi-amping (keep passive c/o's) then more choice for the drivers, as sensitivity does not need to match. SS driver does look very usable. |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Tuusula, Finland
|
There is no any visible damage in woofers, but other woofer rattles a bit and gives a distorsion like sound. I presume that cone/surrounds are "tired" and it is not centering speaker in a rigth way anymore. In a very small volume the noise is not audible, but in normal listening level it is well noticeable. Would chancing surrounds help?
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Santa Cruz, California
|
Can you hear any noises when you push the cone in by hand (gently)?
I've seen voice coils come unglued/unwound/uncoiled due to overheating and then you can get a rattle/scrape sound . If it only partially came apart then that might account for noise at the extremes of travel. Just a thought. |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Tuusula, Finland
|
Good point! I canīt hear any noise when moving cone by hand. When it is attahced to speaker and music is playing the scratching noise is again well audible.
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Tuusula, Finland
|
If it is so, can it be fixed? On the other hand I would like to update woofers anyway.
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Santa Cruz, California
|
Hmm. It sounds like your initial thought is right, the spider and/or surround is sagging due to age. Either way the prognosis is bad: either recone or new driver.
One last check might settle the question. Turn the speaker upside down and see if the scraping sound improves. This would theoretically apply gravity to correct the sag in the cone/voicecoil. You have to push in the center of the cone when testing by hand. If you push on the side then you too are twisting the voicecoil in the gap. Alternatively, push the cone at various points around the circumference and see if it scrapes in one place. |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Martin Logan CLX distortion | bolserst | Planars & Exotics | 6 | 12th August 2009 06:07 AM |
| martin logan's | dsiroky | Pass Labs | 17 | 16th April 2007 10:13 AM |
| martin logan csl | flodge | Planars & Exotics | 12 | 13th November 2005 02:59 PM |
| Martin logan ascent | jouch | Planars & Exotics | 0 | 25th March 2004 07:02 AM |
| X-Aleph and Martin-Logan | Faber | Pass Labs | 2 | 7th November 2002 08:40 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.10876 seconds (80.43% PHP - 19.57% MySQL) with 10 queries |