|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#471 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Melbourne
|
Quote:
At several 100's of Hz (where it crosses over to Vifa, although it will go higher than that, there is huge overlap), wavelength is still in meters. Can it really be such a huge difference whether you have the baffle extending to the floor or not ? BTW, another inspirational design, John. |
|
|
|
|
|
#472 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Germany
|
EDGE floor bounce simulation for a listening distance of 3 m at 1 m height. This is simulating the woofer only:
![]() One could do a more refined sim with the MJK worksheet, but in general the effect would be the same.
__________________
www.dipolplus.de |
|
|
|
|
#473 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
|
Would it help if you cut big holes (like 8 - 10") in the baffle starting under the height of the normal Manzanita?
I have some Tangband W4 1320. Can they be used instead of the Vifa? Or will there be major changes in the crossover. |
|
|
|
|
#474 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
As Rudolf has shown, the bass extends a little deeper, with slight gain in efficiency, which is what you would expect with a larger baffle. And I also understand that it will probably mess up the target response in combination with the crossover values and design. But what I'm trying to understand is why you have designed it in this way. I have great faith in your design acumen and I'm sure there is a reason to go through the pains of making a separate stand instead of just extending the baffle. So, John, what is the effect or combination of effects that you have designed into the woofer position and baffle dimensions? Pano, why would the floor bounce not be there? |
|
|
|
|
|
#476 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
|
What C1 cap affects ? bigger value will give less/more treble?
|
|
|
|
|
#477 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Does anybody have some real world measurements of the FR Vifa driver listed?
|
|
|
|
|
#478 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
|
Quote:
this way it might still aucustically work as the short Manzanita baffle but look like a full baffle down to the floor and you don't need a stand for them |
|
|
|
|
|
#479 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hill country, Texas
|
The interest in my baffle configuration decision(s) is a bit surprising to me. I made quite a few heavy cardboard prototype baffles. All sizes and shapes. Various wing depths, shapes. Various woofer and tweeter positions. A couple of things stood out during that process.
When the woofer was close to the floor it's response was quite uneven, both audibly and measured. And with larger width, taller baffles I noticed a large peak in the 52-56 Hz area. The greater the total baffle area, the greater the peak. Moving the woofer upward helped a bit. I also noticed that as the baffle narrowed and the woofer was placed 24-30 inches off the floor, the sense of stored energy was reduced by a great deal. It just sounded more natural and balanced and the sound stage also improved. By getting the woofer up off the floor was a kin to adding more distance from the rear wall in terms of sonic performance. I can measure and speculate until the cows come home as to why. But my intuition tells me that when the woofer is closer to acting like it is in free space, (as on a small baffle up off the floor) it is less influenced by reflections from near by surfaces such as the rear wall and the floor. You have to remember that the larger the baffle area is, the more the wall and floor bounce energy will be collected by it. Like it or not, the area behind the baffle forms a cavity at lower frequencies with the rear wall. The bigger the baffle, the bigger the cavity. Long wave lengths act that way in a residential sized room. Anyway, I made the Manzi baffle large enough to provide some woofer loading, keep the woofer above the rear bass plate to minimize close reflections and still have enough real estate left to optimally load the Vifa in terms of target F = and F peak. |
|
|
|
|
#480 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Very curious observations John. In the other thread, What is the ideal directivity pattern for stereo speakers?, it was determined that positioning the woofer next to the floor is one way to eliminate floor reflection. It is interesting that you prefer the woofer off the floor.
You mention that moving the woofer up off the floor is akin to more distance from the rear wall. This, to me, means that when the woofer is on the floor, the early reflection from the floor that is blended with the direct sound from the woofer is more audible (and annoying) than the deep notch produced by the woofer when it is off the floor. |
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| How fast are 'Fast Fuse' and how to identify? | bigpanda | Solid State | 7 | 22nd March 2005 09:00 PM |
| Looking to buy inexpensive... | nelsondog | Chip Amps | 0 | 15th October 2004 03:04 PM |
| Inexpensive project, which to choose? | manxam | Multi-Way | 12 | 28th December 2003 03:51 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |