|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: USA
|
The listening test...
I finally have them together all the way, and I have been experimenting with setup and listening to a variety of music. The overall sound is nice and full and clean, to a point. I am enjoying the music much more now than I was before the sub, so I guess you can call this a success. From a critical point of view, there are a few problems. 1. I still need to make a LT to get better extension. The bottom isn't quite "punchy" enough. Using the line-level inputs I was able to coax a lot more bottom out of them, but then I ran into the woofers' tendency to break up at extreme volumes. I guess one can't expect much from a $12 woofer, eh? The good news is that it takes quite a bit to really push them to that limit. At normal to loud levels they stay very clean. On Aaron Copeland's "Buckaroo Holiday" the bass drum impact is very realistic (I used to play orchestral percussion in high school, so I would know). Only on the loudest transient in this piece do the woofers reach their limit at realistic concert volumes. 2. The mid-bass is a little wooly... I am not getting enough attenuation, even with the crossover set at 40Hz. It's really not bad... just a little too warm. Then again, my MTM's were a lot on the lean side, so that is what I am used to. I am hoping that using a LT in the future along with the crossover will help with this (by boosting the lows... I think I am using the crossover to get a little more extension right now- low crossover point with higher overall level). All in all, they integrate really nicely with my system, especially using the high level inputs. Orchestral and pipe organ music is excellent. Rock is lacking a little kick drum punch, but is probably erring toward the unexaggerated side, which I guess is better, all considered. For the money, I am happy 8 woofers at 12.50 each- $100 US. + shipping 250 Watt Sub amp- $120 shipped MDF and cabinet stuff- $75 So, about $300 for a lot of fun! Here's a picture: |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: USA
|
picture:
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Chatham, England
|
Hi mate,
It looks very impresssive for a $300 project!. It must be all those drivers and the huge boxes As for your response problems, you may be seeing the effects of room modes/gain. Try moving the speaker around a little and see if the response evens out. Or you could just build another one to match! Have you measured the response of the system as a whole in your room? you might be better off just building a single channel sweepable parametic EQ, then you could use it either to simulate a linkwitz transform or maybe notch out a problem frequency.
__________________
Al I conceive of nothing, in religion, science or philosophy, that is more than the proper thing to wear, for a while. Charles Fort |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: USA
|
Tha ks for the suggestions...
The response problems really aren't all that bad. The EQ does sound like it would be a lot more flexible. I think I might build one. Unfortunately, the size of this monster makes placement options limited. It's basically either the right side, or the left. What is interesting is that I had the cabinet operating with 1 driver missing (had a terminal break off) and the low lows were more present. I ran it through bassbox, and the tuning with one 7" hole wasn't too far off ideal for the box. I may end up porting it! I really do like the tight controlled sound that a closed box gives. Maybe EQ first, and then porting as a last resort? Anywho... for right now I am satisfied. The system has slightly exceded my expectations. I can't imagine what something like this could do with good drivers! |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Perth, Australia.
|
Impedence compensation cures a lot of evils - try it and you will like it.
Eric.
__________________
I believe not to believe in any fixed belief system. |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: USA
|
You know, I didn't even think of that! I'll give it a try. THanks!
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: NZ
|
lol that column array of subs is scary : ' (
are u running 8ohms in total ? |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: USA
|
4 ohms...
8 drivers @ 8 ohms- series parallel parallel |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Keep it or Throw it Away | bjackson | Multi-Way | 6 | 30th December 2005 11:38 PM |
| I'm going to throw up now... | abpea | Full Range | 21 | 29th January 2005 03:40 PM |
| My throw-together cheap subwoofer | nobody special | Subwoofers | 25 | 5th February 2003 04:19 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.09597 seconds (77.88% PHP - 22.12% MySQL) with 11 queries |