|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: California
|
Hi All,
For my paper tiger, I'm having some difficulty picking between the Seas T25CF001, 27TDFC, and Peerless 810921. All appear to be fine, low distortion tweeters. When might you pick the T25CF001 over the others? How about the 810921? My paper tiger is an MTM with 5" mid-bass drivers. I will need a low-ish crossover frequency. Thanks for your insights! |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Custom Title
diyAudio Member
|
I use the peerless in a 3 way , practically as a supertweeter. No complaints here, sounds fantastic.
__________________
I write for www.enjoythemusic.com in the DIY section. You may find yourself getting a preview of a project in-progress. Be warned! |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Indiana
|
I was basically in the same situation when I looked for a tweeter for my Usher 8945P 2-way design. I needed one that has the lowest possible distortions down to 1 kHz because I wanted to cross it at 1.5 kHz. Also looked for one under $100.
My choice was the Peerless 810921. But I would've chosen one of the following and be happy with the result: - Dayton RS28A-4 (Zaph's tested sample was from the problematic initial production batch; since then the problem was corrected) - Seas 27TBFC/G - Seas 27TDFC I'd not look at the T25CF001. It's an old design and has been discontinued (maybe some are left at Madisound). Zaph tested it and found that distortion performance was not as good as the Seas Prestige below 2 kHz. |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
|
I'd go 810921 as well
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Hong Kong
|
Wouldn't 27TDC better than 27TDFC??
27TDFC appears to have higher distortion around 5~7KHz, both from Zaph's and Mark's test. Though I don't know how bad this distortion will affect the sound. |
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Indiana
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
|
Quote:
http://www.eldamar.net/audio/RS150MTM/ |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: California
|
Thanks for the advice. I was concerned that the 810921 couldn't crossover particularly low.
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
|
HI
yes the xover sinergy whit woofer ,ie phase,ecc... make the difference |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| To tweet or not to tweet? | pforeman | Full Range | 2 | 7th April 2009 07:30 PM |
| Temp setup: BEST MID AND TWEET we can buy ? | JinMTVT | Multi-Way | 65 | 29th November 2006 12:49 PM |
| Please help me identify this tweet!!! | safetyman | Multi-Way | 2 | 18th December 2005 06:33 AM |
| Anyone measured the PE 269-788 Tweet? | SmarmyDog | Multi-Way | 0 | 1st October 2005 05:18 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.09436 seconds (76.58% PHP - 23.42% MySQL) with 10 queries |