Hello all!
I have an idea for a sick experiment: Put Fostex F200A and Manger in a box with 6dB active x-over and see where, subjectively, is the best x-over point. Will the Manger end up as supertweeter? Or the Fostex as subwoofer? I didn`t post this in the fullrange forum because one could end up with a conventional woofer/tweeter setup, just crossed flatter. What do you think, what would be the result?
I don`t assume anyone has the two lying around.
Currently I am not sick enough to do the test, but this may change. And whatever would be the outcome of the experiment, one could build a really nice box with one-cap-one-coil x-over at the end.
Greets,
Oliver
I have an idea for a sick experiment: Put Fostex F200A and Manger in a box with 6dB active x-over and see where, subjectively, is the best x-over point. Will the Manger end up as supertweeter? Or the Fostex as subwoofer? I didn`t post this in the fullrange forum because one could end up with a conventional woofer/tweeter setup, just crossed flatter. What do you think, what would be the result?
I don`t assume anyone has the two lying around.
Currently I am not sick enough to do the test, but this may change. And whatever would be the outcome of the experiment, one could build a really nice box with one-cap-one-coil x-over at the end.
Greets,
Oliver
el`Ol said:
Put Fostex F200A and Manger in a box with 6dB active x-over and see where, subjectively, is the best x-over point. Will the Manger end up as supertweeter? Or the Fostex as subwoofer?
the are where both drivers will operate fairly wll (300Hz to 3000Hz) mean that you can have almost no crossover maybe just a simple cap for the manger.
the are where both drivers will operate fairly wll (300Hz to 3000Hz) mean that you can have almost no crossover maybe just a simple cap for the manger.
Why does anyone want to do this ? What is the advantage of having "almost no crossover" ?
Regards
Charles
phase_accurate said:
Why does anyone want to do this ? What is the advantage of having "almost no crossover" ?
Regards
Charles
The advantage is, if it isn't necessary you save money and build complexity.
If you don't need any crossover and just ONE driver I see where you can save money.
But if you use TWO expensive (almost fullrange) drivers with ALMOST NO crossover (= different to NO crossover) then you won't save anything.
You then better use a good woofer (much much cheaper than each of these two) paired with either one of these fullrangers.
This thingie would then be a FAST system, i.e. Fullrange And Subwoofer Topology (OK - the use of the therm sub is a little exagerated).
You could even use a simple transient-improved active crossover with this arrangement.
Regards
Charles
But if you use TWO expensive (almost fullrange) drivers with ALMOST NO crossover (= different to NO crossover) then you won't save anything.
You then better use a good woofer (much much cheaper than each of these two) paired with either one of these fullrangers.
This thingie would then be a FAST system, i.e. Fullrange And Subwoofer Topology (OK - the use of the therm sub is a little exagerated).
You could even use a simple transient-improved active crossover with this arrangement.
Regards
Charles
"...if you use TWO expensive (almost fullrange) drivers with ALMOST NO crossover (= different to NO crossover) then you won't save anything."
If you use the two drivers with "almost no" crossover as opposed to the same two drivers with "more" crossover than necessary then you are still saving cost and complexity - that's all I meant.
Cheers
If you use the two drivers with "almost no" crossover as opposed to the same two drivers with "more" crossover than necessary then you are still saving cost and complexity - that's all I meant.
Cheers
Agreed, but normally no one uses both these drivers together WITH a crossover to start with - only to end up with a more expensive solution than using either one together with a woofer. The latter would not only be cheaper but it would offer better quality as well.
Regards
Charles
Regards
Charles
phase_accurate said:But why do you want to split a range into two parts that either driver can manage equally well ?
Regards
Charles
I guess the question is, do they handle the midrange equally well?
If they really do it equally well for audiophysiological reasons it will probably turn out that the extreme versions are superior to crossing in the middle.
I do not quite get what you want to say with this.
Regards
Charles
I guess the question is, do they handle the midrange equally well?
Well - if for instance the Fostex was superior to the Manger in the midrange - I wouldn't use a Manger as a tweeter since there are specialist drivers that would do the HF better (e.g beaming) than the Manger at a much lower price.
Regards
Charles
phase_accurate said:
I do not quite get what you want to say with this.
Regards
Charles
What I wanted to say: We would have a deviation from the ideal of the point source in the frequency range where the human ear is most sensitive. So in my opinion this would only happen if it REALLY gave sense from a technical point of view.
I'm confused, are you proposing a speaker system using the Fostex and the Manger as a serious design, or just as a test to see which has the better midrange? If you're suggesting these as a system, then I agree with the others, it's expensive, and the two together wouldn't likely be as good as either with a tweeter or woofer.
Fostex F200A
8 ohm impedance
90dB sensitivity at 1W/1m (3.3ft)
$373.70 each
Manger MSW Transducer
4 or 8 ohm 91dB neodymium magnets anodised silver £515.00 each
I had an idea for an inexpensive single cap/coil system. Use a pair of CSS WR125ST speakers with an FR125S. Put the crossover at the baffle step frequency, so that the dual woofers supply 3dB of BSC, with no need for any additional components. Dual WR125's can supply some solid bass, and the coherency should be ideal given all three drivers are almost identical. Not as fancy as a Manger/Fostex, but inexpensive and an easy 8 ohm load (considering Fostex speakers don't get on too well with transistor amps).
Fostex F200A
8 ohm impedance
90dB sensitivity at 1W/1m (3.3ft)
$373.70 each
Manger MSW Transducer
4 or 8 ohm 91dB neodymium magnets anodised silver £515.00 each
I had an idea for an inexpensive single cap/coil system. Use a pair of CSS WR125ST speakers with an FR125S. Put the crossover at the baffle step frequency, so that the dual woofers supply 3dB of BSC, with no need for any additional components. Dual WR125's can supply some solid bass, and the coherency should be ideal given all three drivers are almost identical. Not as fancy as a Manger/Fostex, but inexpensive and an easy 8 ohm load (considering Fostex speakers don't get on too well with transistor amps).
Manger would probably be nice crossed high, above 500hz
Also the 8" Fostex Alnico might be fine up to this
But crossing that high may be incoherent
The Manger may be too good at this, making the 8" a very difficult match
But you will still be left with no bass and due to BSC also "expencive" loss of sensitivity
Might be better to use a 12" Fostex and cross it 300-500hz
I think it have been suggested
Its all a compromise, no matter what you do
Also the 8" Fostex Alnico might be fine up to this
But crossing that high may be incoherent
The Manger may be too good at this, making the 8" a very difficult match
But you will still be left with no bass and due to BSC also "expencive" loss of sensitivity
Might be better to use a 12" Fostex and cross it 300-500hz
I think it have been suggested
Its all a compromise, no matter what you do
audiobomber said:I'm confused, are you proposing a speaker system using the Fostex and the Manger as a serious design, or just as a test to see which has the better midrange?
It is mainly thought as an unorthodox test which of two widebanders has the better midrange. As I said I would only see it as a recommendable system if it turned out that the ideal x-over is in the middle, which I don`t believe it would happen.
tinitus said:
But you will still be left with no bass
Someone bought an F200A and an AER MD2B for comparison. He didn`t like the treble of the Fostex, but found its bass so good that he considered to let it do the bass job for the AER.
- Status
- This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.
- Home
- Loudspeakers
- Multi-Way
- Manger vs. F200A - sick experiment