|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
|
Hello
I want to made a discrete active crossover, here is low pass possible circuits and in the next message the high pass possible circuits. Do it need a nfb ? What is the formula to calculate the value of L1 L2 C1 for the low pass and C1 C2 L1 for the high pass, for a second order bessel 2khz low pass and high pass filters ? Thank Gaetan |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
|
Hello
Here is the high pass circuit; Gaetan |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Stockholm
|
Well, apart from giving not-so-good distortion data, will the circuit work att all? I mean should it not be a DC path to the input of the first FET? (It was ages since I built something with FETs, so I'm not sure about this).
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Switzerland
|
Yes, there are missing DC paths. Apart from that I'd use RC filters with positive feedback and the FET stages would have to be source-followers.
Regards Charles |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
|
Hello
I was think to use op-amps like THS4032, LM6172 or AD625, but it may not sound as good as a discrete circuit. With op-amp for the low pass and high pass, I would do a 2 nd order modified Bessel filter. Thank Gaetan |
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Sofia
|
Quote:
Maybe not but it will certainly sound better than your proposed circuit. Unless you really adore lots of second harmonics. Unless you include some gate biasing network your circuit won't work anyway. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Stockholm
|
Quote:
I remember a test in a Swedish magazine some 20 years ago, where they tested a ratsnest of 6 OPamps (TL074 and NE5534), "poor" capacitors, 12 metres of cheap signal cable and more. They compared this against a "straight wire" and were very careful with level matching throughout the audible range. Several audiophiles got the opportunity to blind test this in their own equipment. None of them managed to detect it. Now, this was 20 years ago, still in the vinyl era, but ever since I read that test I am sceptical to statements that OPamps "sound bad". I think the test would give the same result today. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | ||
|
Account disabled at member's request
Join Date: Mar 2007
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Switzerland
|
Quote:
And then there are OP-AMPs available today that are even much closer to the "wire with gain". I think one should not overdo it and use masses of them. Regards Charles |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2007
|
You also could use BB OPA143PA.
Be aware, that the input impedance should not exceed 2kOhm, otherwise distortion will rise due to the non-constant input capacity of the FET input stage.
__________________
Houston, we have a problem! |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| MOX-like crossover and discrete opamp group buy | tiroth | Group Buys | 426 | 10th January 2011 07:33 PM |
| Passive crossover into active crossover | hahfran | Multi-Way | 16 | 10th February 2008 06:16 PM |
| Active XOVER....OPAMP or discrete....??? | Lyra | Multi-Way | 8 | 23rd March 2007 12:19 AM |
| active crossover help | Andrewbee | Full Range | 4 | 27th August 2005 12:43 AM |
| XVR1 active crossover, discrete active stage | promitheus | Pass Labs | 18 | 22nd July 2002 01:29 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.12726 seconds (79.67% PHP - 20.33% MySQL) with 11 queries |