Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Multi-Way
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10th September 2007, 09:20 PM   #1
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Default About a discrete active crossover

Hello

I want to made a discrete active crossover, here is low pass possible circuits and in the next message the high pass possible circuits.

Do it need a nfb ?

What is the formula to calculate the value of L1 L2 C1 for the low pass and C1 C2 L1 for the high pass, for a second order bessel 2khz low pass and high pass filters ?

Thank

Gaetan
Attached Images
File Type: jpg fet low pass crossover.jpg (22.3 KB, 516 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 10th September 2007, 09:22 PM   #2
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Hello

Here is the high pass circuit;

Gaetan
Attached Images
File Type: jpg fet high pass crossover.jpg (22.4 KB, 470 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 10th September 2007, 09:48 PM   #3
Svante is offline Svante  Sweden
diyAudio Member
 
Svante's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Stockholm
Well, apart from giving not-so-good distortion data, will the circuit work att all? I mean should it not be a DC path to the input of the first FET? (It was ages since I built something with FETs, so I'm not sure about this).
__________________
Simulate loudspeakers: Basta!
Simulate the baffle step: The Edge
  Reply With Quote
Old 11th September 2007, 07:40 AM   #4
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Switzerland
Yes, there are missing DC paths. Apart from that I'd use RC filters with positive feedback and the FET stages would have to be source-followers.

Regards

Charles
  Reply With Quote
Old 11th September 2007, 05:25 PM   #5
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Hello

I was think to use op-amps like THS4032, LM6172 or AD625, but it may not sound as good as a discrete circuit.

With op-amp for the low pass and high pass, I would do a 2 nd order modified Bessel filter.

Thank

Gaetan
  Reply With Quote
Old 11th September 2007, 08:46 PM   #6
diyAudio Member
 
analog_sa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Sofia
Quote:
Originally posted by gaetan8888
Hello

I was think to use op-amps like THS4032, LM6172 or AD625, but it may not sound as good as a discrete circuit.

Maybe not but it will certainly sound better than your proposed circuit. Unless you really adore lots of second harmonics.

Unless you include some gate biasing network your circuit won't work anyway.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11th September 2007, 09:20 PM   #7
Svante is offline Svante  Sweden
diyAudio Member
 
Svante's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Stockholm
Quote:
Originally posted by gaetan8888
I was think to use op-amps like THS4032, LM6172 or AD625, but it may not sound as good as a discrete circuit.
I'd say it is the other way around, unless you like distortion.

I remember a test in a Swedish magazine some 20 years ago, where they tested a ratsnest of 6 OPamps (TL074 and NE5534), "poor" capacitors, 12 metres of cheap signal cable and more. They compared this against a "straight wire" and were very careful with level matching throughout the audible range.

Several audiophiles got the opportunity to blind test this in their own equipment.

None of them managed to detect it.

Now, this was 20 years ago, still in the vinyl era, but ever since I read that test I am sceptical to statements that OPamps "sound bad". I think the test would give the same result today.
__________________
Simulate loudspeakers: Basta!
Simulate the baffle step: The Edge
  Reply With Quote
Old 11th September 2007, 09:30 PM   #8
Account disabled at member's request
 
MJL21193's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Quote:
Originally posted by gaetan8888

I was think to use op-amps like THS4032, LM6172 or AD625, but it may not sound as good as a discrete circuit.
That's a completely false assumption. Op-amp filter implementation is not only easier, but usually much better.

Quote:
Originally posted by Svante


I'd say it is the other way around, unless you like distortion.
The bias against op-amps is more audiophoolery.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12th September 2007, 06:29 AM   #9
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Switzerland
Quote:
Now, this was 20 years ago, still in the vinyl era, but ever since I read that test I am sceptical to statements that OPamps "sound bad". I think the test would give the same result today.
Most probably.
And then there are OP-AMPs available today that are even much closer to the "wire with gain".

I think one should not overdo it and use masses of them.

Regards

Charles
  Reply With Quote
Old 12th September 2007, 06:30 PM   #10
diyAudio Member
 
Keruskerfuerst's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
You also could use BB OPA143PA.

Be aware, that the input impedance should not exceed 2kOhm, otherwise distortion will rise due to the non-constant input capacity of the FET input stage.
__________________
Houston, we have a problem!
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
MOX-like crossover and discrete opamp group buy tiroth Group Buys 426 10th January 2011 07:33 PM
Passive crossover into active crossover hahfran Multi-Way 16 10th February 2008 06:16 PM
Active XOVER....OPAMP or discrete....??? Lyra Multi-Way 8 23rd March 2007 12:19 AM
active crossover help Andrewbee Full Range 4 27th August 2005 12:43 AM
XVR1 active crossover, discrete active stage promitheus Pass Labs 18 22nd July 2002 01:29 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 08:05 PM.

Page generated in 0.12726 seconds (79.67% PHP - 20.33% MySQL) with 11 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio