|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Pune India
|
Herewith attached 3 jig pictures. I have used first two of them. I find first to be better and giving consistence results. But there are many views about the fixture for thielsmall testing. I want view of the other friends of this group to share the experience.
Further Loudspeaker cookbook says that we have to use lowest signal level for testing thielsmall. Opinion about the signal level is also welcome. MP |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Guelph, Ontario, Canada
|
The jpg's that you attached are not attached LOL
Thiele/Small in itself is a "small signal analysis", which means everything is calculated at very low power. When you use Thiele/Small parameters in most enclosure modelling programs what you get is an indication of the response you will get for any given box volume, based on low power applied to the driver. In the real world, a speaker is a very non-linear device, and as you increase the power level to the driver the voice coil heats up etc. and the alignment of the enclosure changes. Usually the "Q" of the system will increase. Some of the more expensive speaker modelling programs will allow you to model and predict what will happen as you increase the power level. One of these programs is called LEAP from LinearX Systems in the USA. http://www.linearx.com Hope this helps a little; DOUG |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Pune India
|
sorry friends,
Here is the image. |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| which is better method for Thiel small parameter testing? | jaya000 | Multi-Way | 15 | 13th May 2008 12:17 PM |
| thiel small testing software? | mhtplsh | Multi-Way | 3 | 26th December 2007 05:02 PM |
| Thiel small testing | mhtplsh | Subwoofers | 16 | 25th December 2007 05:46 PM |
| Testing Thiel Small parameters. | AndrewT | Multi-Way | 2 | 13th May 2005 06:05 PM |
| thiel small testing | palesha | Multi-Way | 37 | 22nd November 2002 05:00 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.11981 seconds (51.80% PHP - 48.20% MySQL) with 11 queries |