|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Sudbury, Ontario Canada
|
I purchased an XM46SB passive line-level crossover from Marchand; 80 Hz BW2 high pass. The circuit is shown in the manual:
http://www.marchandelec.com/ftp/xm46man.pdf The input impedance of my power amp is 22K. When I told that to Phil, he said it doesn't matter. I don't get it. Wouldn't the amp's impedance affect the XO frequency? The supplied component values are: R1 = 2.55k L1 = 5.6 H C1 = 0.47 uf C2 = 0.22 uf (C1 + C2 = 0.7uf actual, according to the written notes in my manual). I'd like to adjust the component values to make it possibly more accurate. At the same time, I'd like to use a pair of .33uf Auricaps I have lying around. The inductor value can't change, but I could easily change R1 and the caps. Can someone please help tweak this circuit?
__________________
Dan |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
|
Hi,
You have not specified R2. R1 and R2 make the filter fairly tolerant of load impedance and normal source impedances. Absolute accuracy of 80Hz high pass 24dB/oct (should be L/R) is not necessary if you have an adjustable 24dB/oct low pass on the subwoofer. Careful speaker + sub placement + sub adjustment will be needed. Theoretically you need a 22K resistor on the output (no level adj.) |
|
|
|
|
#3 | ||
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Sudbury, Ontario Canada
|
Quote:
There's only one resistor, R1. Note that this is a 2nd order Butterworth, high pass only. The high pass filter combines with the natural roll-off of my sealed BESL MTM's to provide 24 dB slope. This is for a stereo system, where the dual subs are placed directly below the main monitors. I know absolute accuracy is not strictly needed, but I want to upgrade the caps, and if I'm going to do that, I might as well try to improve the crossover point as well. Quote:
Shouldn't I change R1 and the caps so that I get -3dB at 80 Hz for both legs?
__________________
Dan |
||
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
|
Hi,
So your using half of the board twice ? C1 = C1a, C2 = C1b. ....... BW2 = butterworth 2nd order 7uF + 5.6H with zero source impedance and 2Kohm load = 80Hz BW2. You cannot treat each component seperately. Reduce R1. Find an on-line BW2 calculator to play with values. |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Sudbury, Ontario Canada
|
C1 = C1a, C2 = C1b
Oops, yes, sorry for confusing the issue.
__________________
Dan |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Sudbury, Ontario Canada
|
This looks like a good calculator: http://www.the12volt.com/caraudio/crosscalc.asp#cc
__________________
Dan |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| PLLXO (v AXO v PXO) benefits/ Model? | rick57 | Multi-Way | 42 | 9th August 2011 11:12 PM |
| Pedja Rogic buffer + pllxo | joshuajoshua | Chip Amps | 0 | 31st January 2009 05:32 AM |
| Using phono input with PLLXO | mashaffer | Subwoofers | 0 | 13th August 2007 11:36 PM |
| PLLXO high pass | Soulwax | Multi-Way | 8 | 6th May 2005 12:40 AM |
| PLLXO driven by Sonic impact - HOW? | ThomasS | Class D | 4 | 5th April 2005 10:08 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.09066 seconds (76.70% PHP - 23.30% MySQL) with 10 queries |