Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Multi-Way
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 28th July 2007, 03:26 PM   #1
diyAudio Member
 
Timn8ter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Seattle, WA
Default Adire Dakini (DDR) Modification

Finally got these speakers in running order housed in very humble home built cabinets. Originally built per the published plans
http://www.adireaudio.com/Files/DDRDipoleDesign.pdf
I have added a pair of Linkwitz Dipole Woofer 2 to the bottom of each panel.
http://www.linkwitzlab.com/woofer2.htm
We're talking 4, yes count 'em, 4 Adire Shivas.
What I'm enjoying about this design, other than the sound of course, is I will continue to modify them over time. The MTM portion is still running with the original passive XO. This could easily be changed out for a fully active system. Also, I may want to try the replacement units for the Extremis whenever they become available. I would especially be interested if the cone material was something other than poly.
The low frequency sections are currently being powered by a Parts Express 250W plate amp, so while there are two bass sections they are currently mono, not stereo. This is temporary as I have a two-channel 4th order active crossover in the works.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg dakini2.jpg (67.1 KB, 335 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 28th July 2007, 03:28 PM   #2
diyAudio Member
 
Timn8ter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Seattle, WA
With the grill cover removed.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg dakini3.jpg (65.9 KB, 335 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 28th July 2007, 03:33 PM   #3
diyAudio Member
 
Timn8ter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Seattle, WA
A view of the back side.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg dakini5.jpg (89.6 KB, 322 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 30th July 2007, 02:39 PM   #4
diyAudio Member
 
Timn8ter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Seattle, WA
A little more info about these.
The upper panel is 3/4" birch ply with 1"x2"poplar trim. The bass portion is built per Linkwitz specs with 1/2 birch ply and 3/4" MDF and 1/4" x 2" poplar trim on top. The grill covers are made from 1/2" partical board.
The struts for the upper panel are supports for modular shelving sold at local home improvement stores and painted with Derusto textured.
The whole thing is coated with MinWax one step traditional maple stain. Gives it kindof an "antique" look.
  Reply With Quote
Old 30th July 2007, 08:03 PM   #5
diyAudio Member
 
gtforme00's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
I like these. Nice work you have done there. My desktop system is a pair of extemis matched with the old radioshack linaeum dipoles (both have equally low efficiency). Sitting just one meter away, I haven't needed a subwoofer yet. But maybe a small dipole bin would be in order to finish the mini DDR system out?

What frequency do you plan to set the woofer/sub-woofer transition at?
  Reply With Quote
Old 30th July 2007, 08:13 PM   #6
diyAudio Member
 
Timn8ter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Seattle, WA
Thanks.
Hard to imagine a subwoofer with Extremis based mains in a PC system. I was using a single vented Extremis bass box for a while with my PC system. Admittedly, my current PC speaker system is my Tang Band W3-871S/W5-704S with an Adire Koda10.
Overkill? Heh...
Anyway, I'm going to start with the high/low pass at 125Hz. The active XO will allow me to easily change this if I find it necessary. There are very few pieces of music that the Extremis cannot deal with at that XO point.
  Reply With Quote
Old 30th July 2007, 08:36 PM   #7
diyAudio Member
 
gtforme00's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
The extremis are in dipole on fairly small U baffles (9" widex4" deep). I am thinking about going with a wider baffle, maybe out of acrylic to reduce the visual impact. That would probably fix the urge to add a subwoofer.

These started as my college apartment speakers, and I never needed a subwoofer in the small room I had there. It was actually best to not have alot of bass because those small rooms really gave you alot of gain in the low frequencies. Now that I've moved on to bigger and better things (and rooms), the bass which once was not lacking has found need of enhancement.

Say, I haven't messed around with these in awhile. The DDR has a crossover frequency to the planar at 1.8kHz right? Do you find the midrange of the Extremis to be wanting at that low of a crossover point? I have mine crossed at 2.5k 4th order active if I recall. If Dan decided to cross the DDR at 1.8k 6th order, is there something I should be avoiding in the upper midrange?

Thanks!
David
  Reply With Quote
Old 31st July 2007, 07:44 PM   #8
diyAudio Member
 
Timn8ter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Seattle, WA
I think it's more of a tonality issue than one of frequency response with the Extremis. Measurement wise, you can run the Extremis up fairly high without encountering unacceptable peaks or dips. Personally, I wouldn't go any higher than 3kHz if you're using a 4th order or better XO. If you have a tweeter that can be crossed lower and still sound good I think you should definitely go with the lower XO point. The Extremis, for all it's virtues, is not a true mid-range driver and should not be treated like one.
I've used the Extremis in a couple of 3-way towers where my XO point to the mid-range was 400Hz. They are quite excellent in that type of application.
  Reply With Quote
Old 1st August 2007, 01:54 AM   #9
arc2v is offline arc2v  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Hey that looks good.

The DDRs were what started me on my DIY Dipole quest. I fell in love with the design just in time to find out you can't get the drivers anymore. Figures.

But I've been playing around with some other drivers trying to get a good fit. I was considering trying the dayton reference 5" MTM with the neo 3 and then using the RS 8" with a similar baffle design for the bass section. That won't get me much below 80Hz, though, so I'd still need a sub.

Another option is the same lower section, but using a Neo3 and Neo8 open baffle for the upper.

I like your idea of using a plate amp for the woofers. My biggest trouble so far has been level matching everything. I've been trying to do the whole thing passive 3 way.

Great work though! Those speakers look great!
  Reply With Quote
Old 1st August 2007, 04:08 AM   #10
diyAudio Member
 
Timn8ter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Seattle, WA
Thanks arc, I think the basic concept can be applied using an assortment of available drivers.
Good luck with your project!
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Has anyone used an Adire ADA amp? BassAwdyO Subwoofers 16 20th October 2005 01:45 PM
Adire HE 12.1 bhg41088 Multi-Way 11 14th February 2005 06:41 PM
Adire Fazorcat Subwoofers 29 4th February 2005 05:16 PM
My Adire's dome406 Multi-Way 1 15th July 2004 06:20 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 10:41 PM.

Page generated in 0.10474 seconds (80.57% PHP - 19.43% MySQL) with 11 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio