|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Friend has a pair of old Cerwin Vega PD-3 PA speakers which need midranges-not just diaphragms, there is a hole where the midranges used to be. Found out the midrange on this model is the Cerwin Vega H25. Looking at the frequency response, which I found here, I noticed that this unit seems to be putting out 112 dB @ 1M/1Watt. Chart is reproduced below. Win ISD will not allow simulations above 106 dB at 1M/1 Watt. Small's chart for bass response tops out at 112 dB at 1M/1 Watt. Seems to me this chart shows the Cerwin Vega, through part of it's band, as being either 100% efficient or 400% efficient, 6 dB meaning 4 times the power. Even 100% efficiency seems far fetched, 50% efficiency is superb. Any help understanding this would be appreciated.
__________________
"A friend will help you move. A really good friend will help you move a body." -Anonymous |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Speakerholic
diyAudio Moderator
|
KW,
According to this calculator 112dB at 1 watt translates to an efficiency rating of 1 or 100% http://www.sengpielaudio.com/calculator-efficiency.htm |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Toronto, ON, Canada
|
Omnipolar radiation?
__________________
Building a 2.1 system out of a 3/4"x4'x8' sheet |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Vancouver, BC
|
that's impossible, nothing is 100% efficient. I didn't think speakers were even close...?
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
Wiki. Theoretically, if you have a driver with Fs of 116Hz, Vas of 403 litres and Qes of 0.6, then you'll have a 100% efficient driver (ie. 112dB/1w/1m).
But, nature will conspire against you to ensure that this (or other) set(s) of combinations for your driver will not occur.
__________________
Jont. "It is impossible to build a fool proof system; because fools are so ingenious." |
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Speakerholic
diyAudio Moderator
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
This is dependent upon the radiation pattern of the device. Remember, when you measure 112 dB you are measuring the intensity (power per unit area) at that point, not the power being radiated by the device. The reference intensity I_o is 10^-12 watts/m^2, and SPL is given by
SPL = 10*log(I/I_o) = 120 + 10*log(I) so if you have 1 watt of full space radiation you get SPL = 120 + 10*log( 1w / 4pi ) = 109 or in half space you get SPL = 120 + 10*log( 1w / 2pi ) = 112 If, for a rough approximation, you treat the device as if it has uniform axisymmetric radiation with an exact beamwidth of x degrees, then the area radiated over at 1 m is 2*pi*(1 - cos(x/2)) so the SPL for 1 watt of radiation is: SPL = 120 + 10*log(1 / 2*pi*(1 - cos(x/2)) ) = 120 - 10log(2pi) - 10*log(1 - cos(x/2)) = 112 - 10*log(1 - cos(x/2)) A couple sample values: BW SPL 360 109 180 112 120 115 90 117.3 60 120.7 I hope this helps Nolen |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Canandaigua, NY USA
|
Rybaudio- I started to do the same calc, but got lost right at the beginning. How do you get from the 0dB level of 0.0002 dynes/cm^2 to watts/cm^2? There's something really simple I'm missing!
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: 65N 25E
|
Quote:
I guess that Rybaudio was using approxmate value of 10^-12 W/m2 right away as it is commonly used in calculations like this. I found following http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sound_power P=(A*p^2)/Z Z is the acoustic impedance of air, at +25c about 410 (Pa*s/m) SPL 0db reference level of 20uPascal translates then to 20u*20u*1m2/410 =0.976pW/m2 which rounds up to easy 10^-12 W/m2 |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
I got that value from a reference textbook a while back and have used it so many times that I just remember it. I think it was in Kinsler and Frey's Fundamentals of Acoustics, but I'm not sure and right now most of my books are packed away in a move.
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| What constitutes "Acceptable " performance | Moondog55 | Multi-Way | 35 | 23rd February 2009 07:57 PM |
| What constitutes a line array? | Cal Weldon | Multi-Way | 6 | 23rd May 2008 03:32 PM |
| WTB: Shinkoh Tantalums (52k 1Watt) | ckniker | Swap Meet | 1 | 10th March 2008 05:40 PM |
| What constitutes a leaky Coupling capacitor? | Drewaudio | Tubes / Valves | 5 | 23rd September 2007 06:33 AM |
| Doubts regarding a 1Watt FM TX Kit | xitronics | Solid State | 8 | 23rd May 2007 08:19 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.11355 seconds (80.23% PHP - 19.77% MySQL) with 11 queries |