Inductor types and corresponding tonality - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Multi-Way
Home Forums Rules Articles diyAudio Store Gallery Wiki Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12th July 2007, 02:34 AM   #1
diyAudio Member
tommytube's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Eastern Oregon
Default Inductor types and corresponding tonality

I have a pair of two ways I've been playing around with. I'm considering doing some Xover updating. I'm confused about what tonality is possible with the different inductor types. Like Parts Express for instance, we've got air core....iron core.....copper foil.

What differences in sound do the difference inductors impart? Right now I have 16 gauge Air cores from Jantzen.

What difference might the more expensive copper foils give me???

Driver compliment is a 8" Dayton RS woofer and the the really nice RS tweeter.

Does getting bigger gauge inductors help anything? Dynamics? I know it increase power handling, but any sonic benefits?

Do caps make a bigger impact than inductors? I'm moving from the basic Dayton polys to some PIO Obligottos.

thanks for any insight,
  Reply With Quote
Old 12th July 2007, 12:10 PM   #2
AMV8 is offline AMV8  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: near london
Hi Tommy

No one else seems to be replying so I will gave you my findings. Please remember though that this is based on my experience from building speakers over the years and others may have different experience.

Different inductors do make a difference. Air core are the best. Having said that I have found little difference if you do not let cored inductors saturate. Also as the value of the inductor rises above a few mh you will need to use cored inductors, for example in the filter associated with the base driver. However make sure that the wire is thick enough to carry the current. I have made a lot of inductors and have not found any advantage with any different wires; just make it thick enough to carry the current.

For capacitors Polypropylene are best and you can obtain values up to 10 or even 50 uf if you have a thick wallet. However above 5uf they are much more expensive than electrolytic. Having said that if you buy 105 degree electrolytics for use with the base filter I do not think you will hear any difference. However you should use polypropylene caps in the treble filter.

Different makes of capacitor do make a difference to the sound. Paying more does not always give you the sound you like. Experiment. I use 105 degree electrolytics from Rapid who stock dubellier caps and I buy polypropylene caps from maplin who stock lcr caps. I make my own inductors with thick wire using ferrite cores for values above 3 mh.

Others may have other experience.

  Reply With Quote


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Copper coil inductor vs. round core inductor tomchaoda Pass Labs 7 21st September 2011 04:42 AM
OS-CON types Glenn2 Digital Source 2 13th May 2007 12:07 PM
air core inductor vs. iron core inductor WBS Planars & Exotics 5 7th May 2007 11:02 PM
For you EE types, please help JMB Digital Source 5 1st July 2005 07:27 PM
For you EE types, help please? JMB Multi-Way 0 30th June 2005 10:13 PM

New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 06:12 AM.

vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2017 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2017 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2