Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Multi-Way
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 7th July 2007, 09:28 PM   #1
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: No. CA.
Default Tractrix Getting it right

Does anyone have access to the patents and any writings by P.G.A. Voight on the tractrix horn, the only thing that seems downloadable at this time from the varous sites maybe differnt from what Voight had layed out, possibly to compensate for the problem of not loading all of the way down to the design Fc. Or do we just take the Fc that we want and lower it by about 25% to reach our target freq.?
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th July 2007, 09:56 PM   #2
tinitus is offline tinitus  Europe
diyAudio Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
I was once told to use at stick of a certain length .... and the flare comes by itself .... no, not a magic stick its true allright ... something about moving the stick in certain incrediments(?), crossing the previous point
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th July 2007, 10:25 PM   #3
diyAudio Member
 
Scottmoose's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: UK
I've got Voigt's 1926 patent application ('Improvements in Horns for Acoustic Instruments') re the tractrix contour on my computer at the moment. It's a bit of a pain to read as it's in 4 separate pdf files. If you PM me, I'll send you over a copy.

FWIW, I don't like the tractrix contour for bass horns. Give me a good hyperbolic or hypex any day. It's fine for the midrange etc of course, and to be fair, a friend of mine built a superb pair of tractrix bass horns for his EX4s, so YMMV as ever.

Scott
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th July 2007, 10:42 PM   #4
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: No. CA.
Default MAjic Stick

Dinsdale gives an illustration of the of the graphical construction of the Tractrix, you can down load a copy of the articule from

http://www.volvotreter.de/dl-section.htm
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th July 2007, 11:47 PM   #5
GM is offline GM  United States
diyAudio Member
 
GM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Chamblee, Ga.
Default Re: Tractrix Getting it right

Greets!

Well, when I did it was closer to a half octave (0.707*Fc), but the problem is that the low throat distortion you use the tractrix for is now worse than if you'd used an expo with a tractrix-like mouth end correction. Then there's the much increased beaming issue..... Not many 'free lunches' in audio design.

GM
__________________
Loud is Beautiful if it's Clean! As always though, the usual disclaimers apply to this post's contents.
  Reply With Quote
Old 8th July 2007, 09:23 PM   #6
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: No. CA.
Default 1/2 Octave lower

It's interesting that the .707*Fc comes close to what is stated in the HornClac Tractrix software documentation. There it is stated that "P.G.A. Voight can be claimed to calculate: Fc=c/(4*r)." If this is true then the horn is even larger then what you've come up with.
  Reply With Quote
Old 9th July 2007, 12:53 AM   #7
diyAudio Member
 
Cloth Ears's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Melbourne, Australia
James Melhuishs' Tractrix Calculator.
__________________
Jont.
"It is impossible to build a fool proof system; because fools are so ingenious."
  Reply With Quote
Old 9th July 2007, 02:48 AM   #8
GM is offline GM  United States
diyAudio Member
 
GM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Chamblee, Ga.
Default Re: 1/2 Octave lower

Quote:
Originally posted by David R. Carlso
......."P.G.A. Voight can be claimed to calculate: Fc=c/(4*r)."
Interesting, never seen this before and according to it the horn I built should have been another ~5.83" long, which I know isn't true, so I have to wonder if it's just an approximation for patent/whatever purposes.
__________________
Loud is Beautiful if it's Clean! As always though, the usual disclaimers apply to this post's contents.
  Reply With Quote
Old 9th July 2007, 08:15 AM   #9
diyAudio Member
 
Scottmoose's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: UK
I think it's more of an assumption on the part of the the author of the HornCalc software, although Voigt clearly generalised -reading p.2 of his patent, he didn't make quite such a specific claim; only that "...such that the sound is expanding as if the source was at the fixed distance which is at least a quarter wavelength of the lowest frequency at which full efficiency is required, away."
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Tractrix jphaggar Full Range 11 18th January 2009 02:16 AM
Fostex for MF/HF tractrix AuroraB Full Range 2 9th March 2008 09:18 AM
Tractrix info? bobhayes Full Range 6 3rd April 2007 03:02 AM
150 HZ Tractrix contour kartsmart Full Range 2 21st September 2005 02:06 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 03:06 AM.

Page generated in 0.09533 seconds (77.23% PHP - 22.77% MySQL) with 10 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio