This is perhaps a silly question but I'm wondering why there is little discussion of using a passive crossover before the amplification stage in a bi-amped setup?
To me, this seems like a good idea as you can avoid the complexity of an active crossover and still get all the benefits of bi-amping, such as being able to use a zobel network etc. The crossover would only have to deal with line level.
What am I missing?
Apologies if this has been gone through before, I didn't find much on a search of both here and google.
To me, this seems like a good idea as you can avoid the complexity of an active crossover and still get all the benefits of bi-amping, such as being able to use a zobel network etc. The crossover would only have to deal with line level.
What am I missing?
Apologies if this has been gone through before, I didn't find much on a search of both here and google.
Search the net for "passive line crossover" and you'll find needed information. Like this:
http://www.t-linespeakers.org/tech/filters/passiveHLxo.html
The method is relatively used, especialy in automotive audio line.
http://www.t-linespeakers.org/tech/filters/passiveHLxo.html
The method is relatively used, especialy in automotive audio line.
- Status
- This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.